Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Likelihood of Burst Appendix Tied to Insurance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 07:51 AM
Original message
Likelihood of Burst Appendix Tied to Insurance
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/16/health/16appe.html?ref=science


By NICHOLAS BAKALAR



According to background information in the article, the proper treatment for appendicitis is surgery, and the time to operation is the most significant predictor of a rupture. A perforated appendix can lead to longer stays in the hospital, increased health care costs and sometimes fatal infection.

The scientists, writing last month in The Journal of the American College of Surgeons, used state data from 2003 and 2004 in New York and included 26,637 appendicitis patients, of whom 7,969 had a ruptured appendix. There were no significant differences in the likelihood of perforation among whites, African-Americans, Hispanics and Asians.

But the kind of insurance — or lack of it — had a significant effect. Compared with patients who had private insurance coverage, those on Medicare were 14 percent more likely to have a burst appendix, people on Medicaid were 22 percent more likely, and those with no insurance at all were 18 percent more likely to have a rupture. The differences persisted even after controlling for age, sex, socioeconomic status, type of hospital and other factors.

“Because this is a retrospective study, we can only document that the disparities exist,” said Dr. Fredric M. Pieracci, the lead author and a surgical resident at the Weill Cornell Medical Center in New York. “We can’t explain them. But other studies have identified one of the main reasons is fear of financial repercussions. There can still be inadequate coverage with public insurance as opposed to private insurance.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. "(one of) reasons is fear of financial repercussions" - a good public health reason for universal
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I Can't Think of Any Bad Reasons Connected To Universal, Single Payer Health Care
unless one is a devotee of the "undeserving poor" concept!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. neither can i but
maybe we should ask our candidates,other than kucinich, why they don`t support universal coverage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Easy answer is Insurance company power and Americans thinking they always want "choice" - but
I agree the universal single payer is much the better option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. college age girls need to be checked for STD before appendectomy-I know two young women
that had an appendectomy, neither was tested for an STD before surgery. Symptoms can be very similar. Of course for surgery they load one full of anti-biotics, thus rendering any post surgery STD test useless. Both did NOT have appendicitis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC