Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Katrina vanden Heuvel: Candidates Should Hammer Away at Wars' Costs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:27 PM
Original message
Katrina vanden Heuvel: Candidates Should Hammer Away at Wars' Costs
from The Nation:




CANDIDATES SHOULD HAMMER AWAY AT WARS' COSTS...At a time of economic pain-- as the mortgage crisis metastasizes, bankruptcies and homelessness rise, and the costs of food, gasoline, and home heating oil soar, you'd think the candidates would be talking more boldly about the economic costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

A just-released report by the Joint Economic Committee is a stark reminder of how the war is depleting resources desperately needed to fund programs at home and abroad. The report, according to the Washington Post, puts the wars' costs, so far, at approximately $1.5 trillion. {That's taking into account "hidden" costs--including higher oil prices, the costs of treating wounded vets and interest payments on money borrowed to pay for the wars.)

Monthly cost in Iraq: $2 billion. Cost, so far, to the average family of four: more than $20,000.

While today's new numbers are staggering, as my colleage Matthew Blake pointed out in a recent blog the Congressional Budget office estimated in August that the total costs of the war in Iraq and Afganistan could total a mind-boggling $2.4 trillion. According to the CBO report, that's enough to "provide every college freshman in the country with a free four-year education at a private college or university; provide health care coverage to every American for one year, pay off 26% of our current national debt."

Of course, it's not just the money we're bleeding--every day innocent Iraqis and US troops are killed.

"Someday, somebody has to pay for this war and that's going to the children of the wounded," Congressman Jim McGovern (D, MA) said recently. Isn't it time for candidates to start talking about economic and human security, and speak clearly about how we can use the billions being squandered to fund desperately needed priorities?



Posted by Katrina vanden Heuvel at 11/13/2007 @ 1:36pm

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters?bid=45&pid=251433

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, and point out that this war is the most expensive in history BECAUSE
we have more paid mercenary troops there than military ones and THEY are paid 3 to 4 times MOR than our military folks are!

It's bad enough that we went to war on lies, but we also went to war depending on the use of mercinaries to make up for the Rummy "smaller & meaner" army!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC