Columnists War Breaks Out at 'NYT'

from E&P, via AlterNet:



Columnists War Breaks Out at 'NYT'

By Greg Mitchell, Editor & Publisher. Posted November 14, 2007.


New York Times columnists Bob Herbert, Paul Krugman and David Brooks battle it out over Reagan and racism.



NEW YORK -- The New York Times Op-Ed page hasn't been this hot in a long time. Now we are experiencing Columnist Wars, with Bob Herbert today joining in a rapidly escalating battle between Paul Krugman and David Brooks -- largely over an incident involving Ronald Reagan at a local fair over 27 years ago.

None has mentioned a colleague by name, while tossing around charges such as "woefully wrongheaded" and "agitprop."

Krugman kicked it off with a Sept. 27 column on the Republicans' continuing problems in attracting minority voters. "Republican politicians ... understand quite well that the G.O.P.'s national success since the 1970s owes everything to the partisan switch of Southern whites," he declared. "Since the days of Gerald Ford, just about every Republican presidential campaign has included some symbolic gesture of approval for good old-fashioned racism."

Then came this kicker, as Krugman charged that GOP godfather, Ronald Reagan, who "began his political career by campaigning against California's Fair Housing Act, started his 1980 campaign with a speech supporting states' rights delivered just outside Philadelphia, Miss., where three civil rights workers were murdered."

Brooks took awhile, but fired back on Nov. 9, opening his column: "Today, I'm going to write about a slur. It's a distortion that's been around for a while, but has spread like a weed over the past few months. It was concocted for partisan reasons: to flatter the prejudices of one side, to demonize the other and to simplify a complicated reality into a political nursery tale.

"The distortion concerns a speech Ronald Reagan gave during the 1980 campaign in Philadelphia, Miss., which is where three civil rights workers had been murdered 16 years earlier. An increasing number of left-wing commentators assert that Reagan kicked off his 1980 presidential campaign with a states' rights speech in Philadelphia to send a signal to white racists that he was on their side. The speech is taken as proof that the Republican majority was built on racism. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/67814/

and corrupt repuke leaders, the repukes say, "Oh he wasn't racist or corrupt he was simply ignorant and incompetent." If Reagan didn't know his words would be interpreted as racist then he should have known. Either way, incompetent or racist, he is a sad example of leadership.

They use the same argument defending the bushes. They are just incompetent not corrupt. Either way, they are despicable leaders.

shell of what should have been a human being.

he can use to defend his hero.