Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times' Kit Seelye: McCain "Bitch" Episode Is Bad For Hillary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-17-07 10:26 PM
Original message
NY Times' Kit Seelye: McCain "Bitch" Episode Is Bad For Hillary
By Greg Sargeant
Nov. 16/2007
NY Times' Kit Seelye: McCain "Bitch" Episode Is Bad For Hillary

The piece, by "Kit" Seelye, contains this startling bit of analysis:

Clinton allies have suggested in the past that sexism-based attacks can actually help Mrs. Clinton by inspiring sympathy among women. They may even win over some voters who understand that campaigns are brutal but who appreciate a candidate who can “handle it,” as former President Bill Clinton recently said of his wife.
At the same time, the episode may remind voters that many people have strong feelings about Mrs. Clinton and make them question whether they want to live with animosity and polarization.



The piece adds that this episode may serve as "a reminder that many voters view Mrs. Clinton as divisive."

The "bitch" episode is bad for Hillary? Hmmm -- that's a pretty silly conclusion. First off, there's far less analysis in this piece on the question of whether this is good or bad politically for John McCain, even though he's the person who stood by while his supporter uttered the slur and proceeded to raise money off of it. We only hear Seelye's views on whether this is good or bad for Hillary, even though her only involvement in this was that a McCain supporter somewhere thinks she's a "bitch" and gave voice to that sentiment.

...

If voters are reminded of this it will be because they're being reminded of it by ... people like Seelye, who says it here twice. As always, your political media figures will just never acknowledge their own role in shaping our political narratives and our perceptions of public figures.

This piece spends far more time telling us that this "bitch" episode is bad for Hillary than it does in telling us whether McCain's fundraising appeal was, you know, true or not. Bizarre journalistic priorities indeed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-17-07 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gwad, I hate those
mediawhores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-17-07 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. And Seelye is one of the worst.
At www.dailyhowler.com, one can google "seelye" and come with 161 examples of her made-up BS about Gore and other Democrats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. I know..I just see the name
and it registers "MEDIAWHORE ALERT".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-17-07 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Actually, it reminds me that republicans have no honor or dignity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-17-07 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Now, there's a photo of a REAL b-----.
Edited on Sat Nov-17-07 10:53 PM by Maccagirl
I still get angry every time I see it. It also reminds me why I'm a liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. It's so ingrained in my
psyche now..I don't need to be freakin' reminded anymore. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. The poor, deluded soul. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-17-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. So basically, Kit Seelye is saying that Sen. Clinton really is a b&tch...without really saying it.
By saying that the episode will remind voters how "devisive" Sen. Clinton supposedly is, Kit Seelye is trying to find a polite way to say 'yea,she's really a b&tch." Really sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-17-07 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. there is going to be animosity and polarization
no matter who is elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twitch14 Donating Member (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. That's Mrs. Bitch to you, pal n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. How do we stop that bitch Seelye?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. With a wooden stake!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-18-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Touche', dude.
That's what's incredibly blatant .. the only way to stop these mediawhorebitches is to run wooden stakes through their fucking blood-sucking faux hearts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC