Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Apaches Rise to Defend Homelands from Homeland Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:49 PM
Original message
Apaches Rise to Defend Homelands from Homeland Security
Apache land owners on the Rio Grande told Homeland Security to halt the seizure of their lands for the U.S.-Mexico border wall on Jan. 7, 2008. It was the same day that a 30-day notice from Homeland Security expired with the threat of land seizures by eminent domain to build the U.S.-Mexico border wall.

Homeland Security (DHS) declared that it will use the principle of eminent domain to take possession of land currently held by private ownership. DHS has also presented waivers requesting that the landowners grant DHS personnel access to their property for a 12-month period in order to conduct surveys for the intended construction project. The property owners were informed that if they do not voluntarily allow the federal agents on their property, the U.S. government will file a lawsuit to grant Homeland Security authorities unimpeded access to private land, despite the owners' opposition. Homeland Security has stated that it will seize property even without the consent of landowners if necessary to complete the construction of the border fence.

Many landowners, as well as civic leaders and human rights activists, oppose the U.S. government's plans to allow federal law enforcement agents access to private property. The government's demands and aggressive tactics are in conflict with settled rights of private property ownership and are particularly disconcerting to the indigenous peoples' communities impacted by this undertaking.
Deep Roots of Resistance

The Texas communities along the international boundary zone are largely made up of Native Americans and of land grant heirs who have resided on inherited properties for hundreds of years. Homeland Security plans to complete the Texas portions of the fence before the end of the 2008 calendar year.

MORE...

http://americas.irc-online.org/am/4884
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm curious as to how this would be handled if the 'communities along the
international boundary zone' were largely made up of rich, white, Texan Republicans. The name Bush comes to mind. Can you imagine DHS even attempting such shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I find this absolutely disgusting. pitting brown, red, yellow or black people against each other
the great white way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. here is a better link ...I don't know what happened with the other one
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 01:22 AM by ursi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. If the Apaches rise, I may have to go down and join them.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuleOfNah Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You will need a valid passport to do so, right?
I wonder what a land grab visa stamp looks like...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds Like Another Invasion of a Sovereign Nation and Treaty Violation
Yawn. So, how about those Pistons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. George W. Bush honoring a treaty?? No!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC