The Environmental Crisis As An Economic Opportunity, And John Edwards As An Angry Populist

http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_lawrence_080118_re_3a__two_matters_3a__t.htm


Programs to clean up the environment are often resisted because they would be an expense, a very large one. But wouldn’t they simultaneously be a fantastic investment opportunity that would work wonders for employment, incomes, return on capital, the economy in general? Take automobiles, for example. If you have to redesign them, retool factories, find lighter materials, revamp engines, and all the rest of the paraphernalia, wouldn’t this of necessity require extensive investment and create new jobs galore?


By the way, isn’t much the same true of the need to fix our infrastructure? Isn’t the need to repair hundreds or thousands of roads and bridges, and to revamp utilities, a sure fire way to launch a thousand ships of private investment, and a thousand arks of jobs? Isn’t that exactly what happened when our original infrastructure was built? - - the railroads in the 1800s, the initial highways in the 1920s, the interstate system in the 1950s and 1960s? Isn’t the environmental crisis, in short, a massive economic opportunity which the foresighted would embrace, and not some kind of economic drain?


On a different note, I’ve read critiques of John Edwards which say he can’t win because, instead of being a sunny upbeat populist, he is an angry one - - just like the original populists were angry, I suppose. He is assailed by the punditry for anger displayed by speaking of “‘corporate greed’” and “‘the destruction of the middle class.’” Well, just what the hell do the pundits think has been going on in this country for the last decade or so - - corporate charity for one and all (not just CEOs) and heartfelt unremitting advancement of the middle class’ interests? Apparently Edwards is supposed to refrain from telling the truth as a lot of us see it and, one might venture to guess, as many, many millions of struggling middle class people see it.

You know, the punditry’s attack on Edwards - - whom they apparently by turns either attack or ignore - - reminds me of a comment by Jefferson. He said that if forced to choose between government without newspapers or newspapers without government, he would choose the latter. Well, I know government has been rotten since the early to mid 1960s, and I also know the media has been rotten since about the 1980s. So maybe we need a third choice in addition to the two considered by Jefferson. Maybe we need a choice among government without the media, the media without government, or neither government nor the mainstream media. I would vote for the last of the three.*

R:\My Files\Blogspot\Blog.JohnEdwards.1.18.08.doc


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* This posting represents the personal views of Lawrence R. Velvel. If you wish to comment on the post, on the general topic of the post, or on the comments of others, you can, if you wish, post your comment on my website, VelvelOnNationalAffairs.com. All comments, of course, represent the views of their writers, not the views of Lawrence R. Velvel or of the Massachusetts School of Law. If you wish your comment to remain private, you can email me at Velvel@mslaw.edu.
VelvelOnNationalAffairs is now available as a podcast. To subscribe please visit VelvelOnNationalAffairs.com, and click on the link on the top left corner of the page. The podcasts can also be found on iTunes or at www.lrvelvel.libsyn.com


In addition, one hour long television book shows, shown on Comcast, on which Dean Velvel, interviews an author, one hour long television panel shows, also shown on Comcast, on which other MSL personnel interview experts about important subjects, conferences on historical and other important subjects held at MSL, presentations by authors who discuss their books at MSL, a radio program (What The Media Won’t Tell You) which is heard on the World Radio Network (which is on Sirrus and other outlets in the U.S.), and an MSL journal of important issues called The Long Term View, can all be accessed on the internet, including by video and audio. For TV shows go to: www.mslaw.edu/about_tv.htm; for book talks go to: www.notedauthors.com; for conferences go to: www.mslawevents.com; for The Long Term View go to: www.mslaw.edu/about­_LTV.htm; and for the radio program go to: www.velvelonmedia.com.






Authors Website: http://velvelonnationalaffairs.com/

Authors Bio:
Lawrence R. Velvel is the Dean of the Massachusetts School of Law, which educates the working class, mid-life people, minorities and immigrants. He is the editor of a journal called The Long Term View, hosts an hour-long TV book show called Books of Our Time, which appears in the New England and Mid-Atlantic states on Comcast's CN8 and is streamed on the internet, and hosts a radio program called What The Media Doesn’t Tell You. The radio program, which is carried on World Radio Network and is streamed on the internet, discusses important matters which the media doesn’t disclose (or insufficiently discloses) and the reasons for the nondisclosure.

Velvel wrote a 1970 book on the constitutionality of the Viet Nam War and civil disobedience, and a recent quartet called Thine Alabaster Cities Gleam, comprised of: Misfit In America; Trail of Tears; The Hopes and Fears of Future Years: Loss and Creation; and The Hopes and Fears of Future Years: Defeat and Victory.

Velvel blogs at velvelonnationalaffairs.com. His 2004 and 2005 posts have been published in Blogs From the Liberal Standpoint: 2004-2005.