Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More Negative Science on Yucca Mt: Does Anyone Care?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 05:44 PM
Original message
More Negative Science on Yucca Mt: Does Anyone Care?

Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste repository

Scientists detail Yucca water threat

More water will travel through mountain than thought, panel is told

By Launce Rake
<lrake@lasvegassun.com>
LAS VEGAS SUN

March 10, 2004

Reports issued Tuesday to an independent federal review board could spell troubling news for backers of a nuclear waste dump at Yucca Mountain.

Scientists told the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board that the climate at Yucca Mountain, 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas, has been and will again be cooler and wetter than it is today, providing more water to corrode metal canisters holding the highly radioactive waste.

Another scientist told the board's panel on the natural systems at Yucca Mountain that old Energy Department models of the rate that water seeps through the mountain's rock were inadequate, meaning that much more water may penetrate the mountain than once thought.

The issues discussed Tuesday shed light on potentially problematic issues for the Energy Department, which plans to begin storing 77,000 tons of nuclear waste in Yucca Mountain by 2010. The Energy Department plans to submit a license application with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission by December that would allow the agency to move forward with the plan to dump the waste.
t much of the water flowed off Yucca Mountain.


http://www.lasvegassun.com/dossier/nuke/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. sure I care
Thanks for the update.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
methinks2 Donating Member (894 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Of course
Yucca mountain is too close to a populated area to be used as a nuclear dump. Only a fool looking for problems would locate a nuclear dump at Yucca mountain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Nevada is NOT a wasteland
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 20th 2024, 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC