Those weapons of mass photography
By Clarence Page
May 13, 2004
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.page13may13,0,7631101.story?coll=bal-oped-headlines WASHINGTON - If I had my way, every enlisted man and woman in the military would be issued a digital camera.
Take, for example, the contempt that Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld showed for the cameras during recent hearings on Capitol Hill. His response to Sen. Susan M. Collins, a Maine Republican, turned into a bit of a rant: "We're functioning in a - with peacetime restraints, with legal requirements in a wartime situation, in the Information Age, where people are running around with digital cameras and taking these unbelievable photographs and then passing them off, against the law, to the media, to our surprise, when they had not even arrived in the Pentagon."
No, folks, it is apparently not the Bush administration's gross lack of preparation for the management of post-Saddam Hussein Iraq that is the problem, in Rummy's view. It's those pesky soldiers and their weapons of mass photography.
Yet something rings a little hollow about Mr. Rumsfeld's complaint. While he complained that the prisoner abuse photos arrived in the hands of the media before they arrived at the Pentagon, the Pentagon sat on a prisoner abuse report without telling Congress or President Bush for two months.