Edited on Fri May-21-04 02:43 PM by mike_c
...goes far beyond questions about who wins the election in November. Current plans in Iraq are the center piece for the neo-conservative foreign policy in the ME. Simply changing the person in the Oval Office will have little effect on derailing those plans if Kerry continues them. It isn't a question of whether there's any "difference" between kerry and Bush-- we all know there are huge differences-- but rather whether or not they ultimately serve the same ideological objectives in U. S. foreign policy.
I agree with Helen-- it is way past time for Kerry to repudiate the neo-con imperialism and start articulating a DIFFERENT foreign policy.
on edit-- merging threads a bit-- the current discussion that Kerry is playing smart politics by letting Bush implode on his own suggests that winning the election is the only part of the American political process that matters. That's wrong, IMO. Kerry needs to be articulating-- forcefully-- a different direction for American foreign policy, starting with our biggest current screw-up: Iraq. The resulting debate will inform the process of selecting not only a president, but a national direction.
|