Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Puppet Cuts His Strings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 10:01 AM
Original message
US Puppet Cuts His Strings
Published on Sunday, April 11, 2010 by The Toronto Sun

US Puppet Cuts His Strings

Thwarted by the American government on compromise with Taliban, Karzai has begun openly defying his patrons

by Eric Margolis


Henry Kissinger once observed that it was more dangerous being America's ally than its enemy.

The latest example: the U.S.-installed Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, who is in serious hot water with his really angry patrons in Washington.

The Obama administration is blaming the largely powerless Karzai, a former CIA "asset," for America's failure to defeat the Taliban. Washington accused Karzai of rigging last year's elections. True enough, but the U.S. pre-rigged the Afghan elections by excluding all parties opposed to western occupation.

Washington, which supports dictators and phoney elections across the Muslim world, had the chutzpah to blast Karzai for corruption and rigging votes. This while the Pentagon was engineering a full military takeover of Pakistan.

The Obama administration made no secret it wanted to replace Karzai. You could almost hear Washington crying, "Bad puppet! Bad puppet!"

Karzai fired back, accusing the U.S. of vote-rigging. He has repeatedly demanded the U.S. military stop killing so many Afghan civilians.

Next, Karzai dropped a bombshell, asserting the U.S. was occupying Afghanistan to dominate the energy-rich Caspian Basin region, not because of the non-existent al-Qaida or Taliban. Karzai said Taliban was "resisting western occupation." The U.S. will soon have 100,000 soldiers in Afghanistan, plus 40,000 dragooned NATO troops.

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/04/11-2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shotten99 Donating Member (478 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. In that case, it's time to let him go it alone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ideally in principle, that should be the goal of "independence" of a nation.
You give financial and military assistance when requested but you also relinquish control when the government also requests it. As the patron, you may not endorse subsequent decisions and policies of that new regime, but it isn't your choice.

A sovereign nation is free of influence and coercion by another other nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. All sovereign nations influence each other. Some more then others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Correct. Influence, not control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. During the Viet Nam war, that would have been the signal for a coup
A takeover by a military commander who liked cooperating with the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. I have a funny feeling, that Karzai is not long for this world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC