|
Within the concept of personal motivation, beyond just motivations of a better society, I had some thoughts on the quote below.
I'm not saying not to stay concerned and involved; just that there is life beyond the keyboard and the TV.
ahh... but that life outside of tv and keyboard, is in part shaped by the mass media effect on people. Because many people do think TV is real, or even that the Internet is real. (So in some fashion it is to them)
But on an individual motivator note, that is a part of the paradox. It requires money in our system to do most of those things away from the keyboard and the TV. Sure some of those things are able to be enjoyed at a small price, parks, beaches, libraries. But most interactions require some level of monetary security. Although that system has been shown to be corrupt.
So you actually match one of the individual starting points for thought, for me at least, many years ago.
If the system requires some resources like material things, and those things are shown as unjust.
Then one of the following must happen.
A person must except corruption, which is the slide down the slippery slope, I did not like that option.
Or
A person must change the injustice in the material or money systems, so that it is possible to achieve acquisition without corruption.
Or
The money system must be removed all together, although peoples natures would reestablish another system, and such an effect is more of a dramatic way to level the systems and distribution in an easier fashion, without addressing the real problems behind systems.
So I figured the 2nd option was best, because that system is done by people simply thinking on actions and systems around them, although it requires the belief that people are more good then bad.
So once that decision is chosen, how can that be done without money?
Learning how people think based on the programing systems like TV, and by injecting whatever thoughts a person has into the environment around that person. And using the keyboard to do that can in theory create a larger audience, although within some systems it can also create the presumption of an audience, although that presumption still achieves intent. Of coarse I also do agree such conversations have to happen when around people in real life also. But TV and keyboard become a big part of low cost information exchange, again with the presumption of non segmented non filtered systems.
So there may be more then TV and the keyboard, but since those other items are not accessible within acceptable actions within a current system, and since the best pick of coarse is to change those systems, the idea of tv and keyboard returns to where most action is spent, even though, yes there is more to the world then TV and a keyboard.
|