Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Britain's election: a primer for Americans - Geoffrey Lawler / LA Times

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 02:17 PM
Original message
Britain's election: a primer for Americans - Geoffrey Lawler / LA Times
An interesting, somewhat tongue-in-cheek piece, from a former member of the British Parliament ~ pinto

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-lawler-20100505,0,1526747.story

Britain's election: a primer for Americans

Britain is likely to have a new prime minister after Thursday's election. But if you haven't followed the ins and outs of Britain's most interesting political contest in years, here is a crash course.

First, the parties. Labour (don't forget the "u") is socialist, but you will not hear that word uttered at all during the campaign. Conservatives cast themselves as modern, progressive and even compassionate — anything but conservative. And the Liberal Democrats? If they are in Conservative rural areas, they are right wing; if they are in urban, Labour areas, they are left wing. Just ask them.

Labour has been in power for 13 years but is campaigning on a theme of "forget the past, it's all about the future." The Conservatives want voters to "remember the past, and vote for change." The Liberal Democrats also hope voters remember the past, specifically 1916, when they were last in power on their own.

Labour is largely (70%) funded by the trade unions; the Conservatives have some wealthy backers but also rely on small donations, while the Liberal Democrats have a piggy bank. During the first week of the campaign, the Conservatives attracted £1.5 million ($2.3 million) in declarable donations, while the Liberal Democrats collected just £20,000 ($30,000) — barely enough to pay for a U.S. presidential candidate's haircuts.

<snip>

For the public, the greatest thing about British politics is that they only have to be endured for four weeks every four or five years. British election campaigns are short and to the point, and political parties are banned from airing television commercials. And while the parties can spend up to about £18 million ($27 million) on their national campaigns, local campaigns are run on a shoestring. The average maximum expenditure a candidate is legally allowed to spend during the campaign is about £11,000 ($17,000) probably less than the amount spent on coffee and donuts for the average U.S. congressional campaign.

******************************************

Geoffrey Lawler, a former Conservative member of the British Parliament, runs a government-relations company. He also co-founded Democracy International Ltd., through which he has trained politicians in new democracies.

Copyright © 2010, The Los Angeles Times

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-lawler-20100505,0,1526747.story



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC