Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Treasury gets a pound of flesh, at last

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:15 AM
Original message
Treasury gets a pound of flesh, at last
http://capitalgainsandgames.com/blog/edmund-l-andrews/1716/treasury-gets-pound-flesh-last?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CapitalGainsAndGames+%28Capital+Gains+and+Games+-+Wall+Street%2C+Washington%2C+and+Everything+in+Between%29

Here's an encouraging bit of news: it turns out Treasury has been smarter than many had expected in pushing the banks to pay up for the privilege of being bailed out.

You can read today's testimony by the deputy special inspector for TARP (SIGTARP) here, and you can read my article on this Wednesday at the Fiscal Times.

Oddly, the SIGTARP's main message was to whine about the lack of transparency and how hard it was for investigators to figure out how Treasury was negotiating with the banks. But the striking part is how cagey and successful Treasury officials were in persuading banks to pay top dollar to buy back stock warrants they gave the government when they got their TARP loans.

When American Express offered to buy back its warrants for $260 million, Treasury rejected the offer and Amex came back with $340 million -- way more than Treasury itself had estimated the warrants were probably worth. Same thing for Morgan Stanley, which bumped up its offer from $900 to $950 million.

A chart compiled by the SIGTARP shows that Treasury rejected almost all the banks' initial offers and got them to come up with substantially more money.

. . . more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. And of course the media is crowing about this!
:sarcasm:

But seriously, this is good. Thank you for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know how to take this...
...this is good news.

I need a minute to let this sink in. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. It did occur to me
Now that Bernie has gotten an audit of SOME of the Fed, it could be interesting to see the reaction from Ron Paul and company if it is discovered that basically they did a very good and responsible job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. We all know where the money is coming from.
But, yes, it's good that after initially accepting outrageously low bids, Geithner was pressured by Congress into treating the taxpayer with a sliver of courtesy. Now, instead of 10%-40% FMV, they'll hold out for 60% FMV. It would have been much better to sell to 3rd parties and avoid these negotiations altogether. It still looks like another gift, particularly in light of the trillions in backdoor bailouts that have allowed the banks to pretend to be solvent and buy their way out of TARP restrictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC