Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gore right to blame Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 09:40 PM
Original message
Gore right to blame Bush
originally from The Capital Times but reposted on algoredemocrats.com
http://www.algoredemocrats.com/news/gnn/EpypuykyElNVnyhDxA.shtml

The American people chose well in the 2000 contest for the presidency. Unfortunately, they did not get their choice.

Al Gore won the most votes for president in 2000. And, had the U.S. Supreme Court not intervened, he might well have won the electoral votes of Florida and taken the oath of office on Jan. 20, 2001.

Instead, the oath was taken by George W. Bush, a frequently failed businessman who gained political stature not by virtue of his accomplishments but by virtue of his relationships, and whose understanding of international affairs was so slim that he struggled to name the leaders of the nations that were America's closest allies. And the rest has been history: tax cuts for the rich and layoffs for working Americans, record deficits, deindustrialization, declining farm prices, botched responses to terrorist threats, the undermining of civil liberties, two unfinished wars, and the collapse of American credibility on the global stage.

Gore has been graceful in defeat, refraining for the most part from commenting on Bush's dismal handling of the most important job in the world. But last week he gave voice to the frustrations of a growing number of Americans.

<SNIP>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. And I say "Good for you, Al". Now if Bill would just find the conscience
and moral clarity to do the same, I think that would be saying something.

I am very disappointed in Bill Clinton. He can see what these thugs have done to this country and the American way of life. What the hell is he holding back for? He is admired all over the world. The destruction wrought by the current administration is always compared to the way things were while Bill Clinton was president. Why is he just letting it all go by without comment. At least Al Gore has shown the decency and dignity to go in front of the American public, and the world, and tell the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. clinton
history buff that he is, probably feels bound by the TRADITION of not saying anything about the person who takes their place. We need Carter and Al to keep hitting the chimperor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC