Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA disclosure is dangerous (Cancer in the Bush Administration)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 12:21 AM
Original message
CIA disclosure is dangerous (Cancer in the Bush Administration)
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/134261_ambassed.html

There's a cancer somewhere in the Bush administration. Two officials revealed national security information to embarrass or scare critics of the administration's mishandling of Iraqi intelligence.

Columnist Robert Novak wrote recently that the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson -- the man who blew the whistle on the Niger uranium fraud -- is a Central Intelligence Agency operative, specializing in weapons of mass destruction. Novak attributed his information to two senior administration officials. Time magazine has said officials provided similar information.

It's illegal for government officials to reveal the identities of CIA operatives who have worked overseas within the preceding five years.

In carefully discussing what he called the hypothetical possibility his wife is a CIA employee, Wilson noted that the use of her maiden name would compromise work done before their marriage five years ago.

Properly, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., has asked the FBI to look into the disclosures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. This should be looked into.
It is a very serious breach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. I was going to post this too.
you beat me to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Searching for Valerie Plame

snip

Search the New York Times website for any occurrence of the words "Valerie Plame" during the last week ...and you'll find nada, zilch, zip. The so-called "paper of record" has remained totally mum on what may be one of the biggest scandals of the Bush administration yet. You can read about it at Newsday, CBS, Time, and The Nation, and it's been mentioned on NBC... but not a word from the New York Times (save for a reference to it last week by syndicated columnist Paul Krugman, and a wire service story today; neither of those pieces mentions Plame by name). The Times' news and editorial divisions are asleep at the switch on this story. Maybe the Jayson Blair scandal was a distraction from the deeper problem: a paper that is so concerned with being balanced and respectable, it refuses to cover any politically controversial stories. You can e-mail letters@nytimes.com to ask why the Valerie Plame news blackout. Or just click this link a few dozen times to send 'em a message.

CIA Back-stabbing
This is appalling. It appears the administration outed Ambassador Joseph Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, an undercover CIA agent who works as an operative in—get this—the agency's Weapons of Mass Destruction program. They've apparently ruined her career and potentially compromised national security simply to lash out at Wilson.

If you think this story is bogus because it appears in The Nation, go read it in Time.) Not only is this astonishingly stupid, it's also against the law. Whoever blew her cover could face up to ten years in prison and a $50,000 fine.

This case apparently involves deciding that your own petulant score with Wilson is more important than a vital CIA program to root out Weapons of Mass Destruction across the globe. This one disclosure could've done more damage to national security than other mistake by this administration in the last several months, including the ill-advised (and now quagmire-ish) invasion of Iraq, which has also apparently made us less safe rather than more.

Whoever blew Plame’s cover should resign immediately and face prosecution for doing so.

If W knew about this and approved of it, it would provide significant and damning evidence that the man doesn't have the judgment to be the president of the United States.

scroll down to above story:
http://www.nypress.com/static/billboard.cfm?now=7/18/03

other links

http://www.thenation.com/capitalgames/index.mhtml?bid=3&pid=823
http://www.motherjones.com/news/dailymojo/2003/30/we_487_04.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A33396-2003Jul23¬Found=true
http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_luskin/truthsquad.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Excellent links, Wonder. thanks for all the work.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fabius Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. I love the first sentence.
"There's a cancer somewhere in the Bush administration."

The Seattle P-I is a big regional paper and gets read by a lot of people.

Add to the sound bites:

Cancer

Bush Lies

Greed

Corruption

Stupidity

etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. This administration is criminal
and nothing will come of this. After all they have killed thousands of people in Iraq under completely false pretenses so they could seize oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vitruvius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Criminal dictators like Bu$h* LOOK invulnerable -- right up to the moment
Edited on Tue Aug-12-03 07:33 AM by Vitruvius
they lose power and go on trial for their crimes.

Once a criminal dictator hits the skids, the slide to infamy and prison or worse can be terrifyingly sudden. The most that can be said is that Bu$h* won't end up hanging by his heels in front of a gas station like Mussolini.

I'd GUESS that Bu$h* has a 1-in-3 chance of going to prison or worse, a 1-in-3 chance of retiring in disgrace with his ill-gotten gains, and a 1-in-3 chance of founding a permanent Rethugnican dictatorship.

It's up to us to do everything we can to prevent option 3, and -- if possible -- have him put on trial to deter future Rethug dictator wannabes.

Vitruvius
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. "There is a Cancer on the Presidency" was John Dean's statement re. Nixon!
I think the writer is drawing a very interesting parallel. Thanks for posting this article for us East Coasters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC