Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Philadelphia Inquirer Ed: "Invasion rationales wither as facts unfold"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 09:50 AM
Original message
Philadelphia Inquirer Ed: "Invasion rationales wither as facts unfold"
http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/editorial/8964906.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

Today's Inquirer editorial is a long, strong, and remarkably comprehensive summary of all the problems with Bushco's Iraq war rationales.

snip>

Did the President and his top advisers lie to the American people? Or were they themselves deceived, by the INC, faulty intelligence and their own tendency to hear what they wanted to hear?

For now, those questions are unanswerable and essentially besides the point.

What matters is that Americans grasp a central point: The multipronged rationale behind this rushed invasion has been revealed as a house of cards.

snip>

Now, ask yourself, along with those 27 American diplomats and warriors: Have the last two years made America more secure, more respected?

The answer is obvious and appalling. The answer is no.

end of article>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. noted and bookmarked n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. I do believe that...
Chimpy has a little problem in Eastern Pennsylvania. Poor Chimpy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Would you believe ... ?
The Inqy's editorial staff is solidly pro-Bush?

Polman, Kunnehen, Schiavo, the whole lot of 'em.

Oh, Satullo and Eisner say they're not biased. That's not even funny, let alone believable.

--bkl


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's why this editorial caught my attention. (nt)
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 17th 2024, 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC