Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"U.S. Abandons Idea of Bigger U.N. Role in Iraq" Soldiers screwed!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 11:46 AM
Original message
"U.S. Abandons Idea of Bigger U.N. Role in Iraq" Soldiers screwed!
Edited on Thu Aug-14-03 11:52 AM by flpoljunkie
Did anyone doubt this would be the Bushco administration's decision? Bush/Cheney administration greed puts cronies profits first--well being of our soldiers way, way down on their list of priorities. This is a morally bankrupt position--and yet, today Bush will use Marines in San Diego as a backdrop to try to boost the morale of those he so callously sends into the chaos and death which reigns in Iraq.

http://nytimes.com/2003/08/14/international/worldspecial/14DIPL.html?hp

By STEVEN R. WEISMAN with FELICITY BARRINGER

WASHINGTON, Aug. 13— The Bush administration has abandoned the idea of giving the United Nations more of a role in the occupation of Iraq as sought by France, India and other countries as a condition for their participation in peacekeeping there, administration officials said today.

<snip>

"The administration is not willing to confront going to the Security Council and saying, 'We really need to make Iraq an international operation,' " said an administration official. "You can make a case that it would be better to do that, but right now the situation in Iraq is not that dire." NOT THAT DIRE, YOU SAY! TELL THAT TO THE FAMILIES OF OUR SOLDIERS!

<snip>

The desire for more United Nations involvement by many countries echoes the debate that preceded the war. Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and others were openly disdainful of getting United Nations authorization for the war, even after Mr. Bush had sided with Secretary of State Colin L. Powell to pursue that route.

Mr. Rumsfeld, according to administration officials, vehemently opposes any dilution of military authority over Iraq by involving the United Nations, either through United Nations peacekeepers or indirectly in any United Nations authorization of forces from other countries.

<snip>

"The last thing we need is a loss of momentum over the efforts to get things under control in Iraq," said a Western diplomat involved in these discussions. "Besides, the violence in Iraq is not as bad as everyone thinks it is." Some experts say that sooner or later the United States may have to change its mind again, particularly if conditions in Iraq deteriorate drastically. United Nations officials involved in peacekeeping efforts in Afghanistan and the Balkans say that the total number of troops in Iraq may have to double before the security situation comes under control.

Edited to fix link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. More likely the UN
Edited on Thu Aug-14-03 11:49 AM by bowens43
told the bush administration to pound salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. AGAIN .. this ANTI - Internationalist fetish in this Administration ....
rears its ugly-assed John Birch head .....

What unmitigated GALL ... The PNAC Chickenhawks AGAIN place profit before blood, and TREASURE before reason ....

This bunch IS dangerous .... and amoral to a man ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curlyred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. loss of momentum? HA!
I'd like to see any amount of momentum in the effort to get things under control. Jeebus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Which diplomat said this?
The last thing we need is a loss of momentum over the efforts to get things under control in Iraq," said a Western diplomat involved in these discussions. "Besides, the violence in Iraq is not as bad as everyone thinks it is."


I think the violence is worse then we are being told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. our UN ambassador is a former Iran-Contra goon
could be him :shrug:


someone pinch me, please...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. getting the UN involved
will save the lives of our soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC