Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Steps to Calm Volatility

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 06:02 PM
Original message
Steps to Calm Volatility
'"The tremors felt in silver started reverberating throughout the entire commodity patch,” said Richard J. Feltes, vice president of research of R. J. O’Brien, a large commodities broker. Silver ended the week down 27 percent. Crude oil was down 15 percent, and most other commodities also fell significantly.

The futures exchanges have been struggling for months to cope with the challenges posed by rapid price increases and head-snapping volatility in many commodities. . .

The financier Wilbur L. Ross Jr., known for his investments in distressed assets, said that speculation in commodities had obviously gotten a little out of hand. “It’s pretty clear that, for example, $10 to $20 of the price of a barrel of oil was mostly due to speculators and there were probably similar proportions in other commodities,” Mr. Ross said. . .

(T)here was no direct nudging from regulators to raise the silver margins, the CME said.

But regulators will soon have the power to lay down their own rules.'

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/09/business/economy/09commodities.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&src=twrhp&pagewanted=1&adxnnlx=1304895704-+QsVPP7sT8HKOsnVClzWHQ



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
westerebus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wall street propaganda.
Why only silver?

It was trading against the bullion bank's shorts.

What a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 'Silver prices finally halted their ascent
— and went into free fall. Last Thursday, the rout spread to a wide range of commodities, including coffee, cotton and oil, as investors looked at silver’s plunge, as well as global interest rate trends and other economic news, and concluded that the yearlong boom in commodities prices was ending.

“The tremors felt in silver started reverberating throughout the entire commodity patch,” said Richard J. Feltes, vice president of research of R. J. O’Brien, a large commodities broker. Silver ended the week down 27 percent. Crude oil was down 15 percent, and most other commodities also fell significantly.

Silver prices finally halted their ascent — and went into free fall. Last Thursday, the rout spread to a wide range of commodities, including coffee, cotton and oil, as investors looked at silver’s plunge, as well as global interest rate trends and other economic news, and concluded that the yearlong boom in commodities prices was ending.

“The tremors felt in silver started reverberating throughout the entire commodity patch,” said Richard J. Feltes, vice president of research of R. J. O’Brien, a large commodities broker. Silver ended the week down 27 percent. Crude oil was down 15 percent, and most other commodities also fell significantly.'



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The CME raised margin requirements for sulver
which spooked a lot of speculators and caused some unexpected margin calls. If they do it to silver, it could be done for other commodities. A bad ISM number and a bad initial unemployment claims number along with a couple lousy economic numbers from Asia made for a nice little commodities storm last week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Volatility is a direct result of income inequality
...a statement I read a good convincing piece on a month or so ago, but can't seem to find a link for now. In any case, if you track market volatility for the past 100 years or so against the conditions of income inequality, you find that the more wealth is concentrated in few hands at the top, the more often and the more wildly the markets swing from boom to bust, and boom to bust, and so on.

It kind of like the difference between a pyramid with the mass naturally in the foundation, and a pyramid with a spindly light foundation and a massive point - which of course just wants to collapse or fall over all the time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC