Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bin Laden Killing Showcases Republicans' Magic Calendar

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 10:02 PM
Original message
Bin Laden Killing Showcases Republicans' Magic Calendar




In a nationally televised address to the American people on March 4, 1987, President Ronald Reagan admitted he had traded arms for hostages in the Iran-Contra scandal and declared, "This happened on my watch." Sadly, that may have been the last time a Republican leader took ownership of a disaster by simply acknowledging the calendar. After all, according to the Republicans' ever-malleable timelines, the Clinton economic boom came thanks to Ronald Reagan, President Bush inherited a recession and 9/11 from his Democratic predecessor, and the financial collapse in 2008 was the "Obama Bear Market." And now, the GOP's new math dictates that George W. Bush deserves the credit for killing Osama Bin Laden.

No doubt, the elimination of the Al Qaeda chieftain was the culmination of years of intelligence work and military asset building that spanned the Bush and Obama administrations. But while President Bush diverted resources from Afghanistan to Iraq, shuttered the CIA's Bin Laden unit and cancelled a 2005 U.S. special operations raid into Pakistan, it was Barack Obama who as promised tripled U.S. troop strength and repeatedly declared that "that if Pakistan cannot or will not act, we will take out high-level terrorist targets like bin Laden if we have them in our sights."

That's a far cry from President Bush's March 13, 2002 declaration in the wake of the failure to capture Bin Laden in Tora Bora, "I truly am not that concerned about him."

Nevertheless, according to the latest Republican revisionist history, George W. Bush did everything but pull the trigger on Sunday. Despite virtually no evidence to support the claim, GOP torture enthusiasts like Peter King (R-NY) trumpeted that "We obtained that information through waterboarding." House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) was just one of a legion of conservatives explaining that credit had one degree of separation, announcing "I commend President Obama who has followed the vigilance of President Bush in bringing bin Laden to justice."

http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/002174.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. how could it be reagan's boom
when clinton RAISED taxes very UN reagan like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's the "magic" part of the calendar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Pretzel logic.
A president's economic policies have a delayed effect, they say. Saint Ronnie took office in January 1981. The Clinton expansion began in October 1994, going by a graph of the S&P 500 - 1 year & 9 months after Clinton had assumed the presidency.

According to this theory, Reagan's magic needed 13 years & 9 months to work, if you go by the date he assumed the presidency. But to be fair let's shift ahead a year to give Saint Ronnie time to start putting his brilliant policies to work. That would mean it took 12 years and 9 months for Reagan to have triggered the Clinton expansion.

Then what about the downturn that began in January 2000, again according to the S&P 500? Was it caused in April 1988 when Reagan was still president? Or should we shift ahead two years or more, assigning blame for that to Poppy Bush?

The truth is, The Reagan Legacy Project and other worshipers are not satisfied with Saint Ronnie's actual economic performance that included tripling the national debt, which turned the USA into a debtor nation for the first time in 72 years. So they just waited until another president really did something good, so that they could assign his credit to Reagan.

This is what it looks like when a well funded conspiracy of corrupt people are doing any and every thing they can to convince us that our highest priority is to give the richest 0.1% of Americans more money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC