Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Glenn Greenwald, Salon: They Hate Us For Our Freedoms

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 10:58 AM
Original message
Glenn Greenwald, Salon: They Hate Us For Our Freedoms
Sunday, May 15, 2011 06:16 ET
Glenn Greenwald
They hate us for our freedoms
By Glenn Greenwald



There's nothing much new to say here, but every now and then, it's worth highlighting not only what we're doing, but what the results are. Just imagine the accumulated hatred from having things like this happen day after day, week after week, year after year, for a full decade now, with no end in sight -- broadcast all over the region. It's literally impossible to convey in words the level of bloodthirsty fury and demands for vengeance that would arise if a foreign army were inside the U.S. killing innocent American children even a handful of times, let alone continuously for a full decade.

It's the perfect self-perpetuating cycle: (1) They hate us and want to attack us because we're over there; therefore, (2) we have to stay and proliferate ourselves because they hate us and want to attack us; (3) our staying and proliferating ourselves makes them hate us and want to attack us more; therefore, (4) we can never leave, because of how much they hate us and want to attack us. The beauty of this War on Terror -- and, as the last two weeks have demonstrated, War is the bipartisan consensus for what we are and should be doing to address Terrorism -- is that it forever sustains its own ostensible cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. "We have always been at war with Oceania."
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. +1
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Meet Hamid Karzai
or as Obama calls him, "The Government of Afghanistan".

He was appointed by Bush the Lesser to run Afghanistan.
He is one of the most despicable criminals in The World,
But NOW we like him so much
that our children fighting and dying in the deserts of Afghanistan to keep him in power.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. "We like him so much". Yeah, and in some far future day
he will go the way of others we once supported, like Saadam Hussein and OBL, probably hanged in the public square. After, of course, the American people have been brought up to date on the official narrative - that we always hated him.

The main reason I never feel sorry for these thugs is that they deserve what they get for being stupid enough to throw their lot in with the US govt. crime syndicate.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keith Bee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Straight to Greatest Threads
Enthusiastic K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. but, but,but, Obama killed Osama ...
so that makes it worth it. :phucktards:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walerosco Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. and if you listen to the experts
that actually made things worse. I just wonder how releasing the irrelevant info about Osama having a stash of porn is going to affect our security
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. It's always about sex.
Domestic surveillance with blanket warrants, scanning phones without consent, monitoring image hosting websites, the reluctance to create a .xxx domain- all lean toward trapping people interested in sex.

It's a great way to control people. Find out what sexual outlets people are pursuing and then subject the targets to public shaming/criminal prosecutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. Anything to demean. These are the same
tactics they use on "friend (if they stand in their way) and foe alike." Our politicians mostly, are pathetic bottom feeders who remind me of the wresslin' industry.

We must unite. Without a form of the Fairness Doctrine being re-instated, it will be hard, almost impossible unless Americans switch, in multitudes, to alternate news sources. TheRealNewsNetwork is priceless for news. Democracy Now and Grit tv are very informative but may cause conservatives some trouble because they do have a left leaning narrative, PBS used to be the answer, it is now neo-con controlled under the surface of impartiality.

We live in the "information era" yet when it comes to anything political, not much real information, mainly disinformation. If (as in the past many decades, ending under Reagan) our government wanted an informed citizenry, then Re-instating the Fairness Doctrine would be done. Since all it takes is the President to tell his appointed FCC commissioners to do so. Proving that we are still under rethuglican control. President Obama has largely left the majority rethug run FCC alone. He was supposed to appoint HIS (our) people to run this hugely formative agency. Another case of, "Meet the New Boss,Same as the old Boss...IMO.
Politburo anyone?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walerosco Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. couldnt agree more
The problem is what happens to enforcing the fairness doctrine when a conservative gets into power? Personally I have given up on mainstream news. I have cut my cable, local paper and am now getting 90% of my news from da web. But the pentagon releasing this info is one of those you cannot escape from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's almost as if we want to make them hate us. This has been
Edited on Sun May-15-11 02:00 PM by sabrina 1
happening, along with imprisonment and torture of many Afghans, and with the presence of out-of-control mercenaries running around partying and prostituting on US tax dollars, for ten years.

And, the people of Afghanistan have been protesting in huge numbers throughout all of it. All ignored by our US media.

Either we are governed by the stupidest people in the world, or someone wants to keep inciting violence to keep these insane wars going.

Greenwald is the conscience of the media. And he takes a lot of abuse for it. But those who attack him have never once shown where he is wrong. If this were happening in this country the rage and anger and calls for the deaths of those responsible would be heard around the world.

Yet, no one in a position to do so ever acknowledges that these are the policies that are threatening the security of this country.

Kudos to Greenwald for not being intimidated into silence. But we need more doing what he does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walerosco Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Classic greenwald
Pointing out the failures of both parties especially when it come to war. The MIC owns both parties atm, it is the reason why the wars never ends. The problems in this country can be traced by to the expanding US empire: terrorism, budget deficits etc

END THE WARS NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keith Bee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rec, damn you, REC!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's not about terrorism, it's about feeding the war profiteers who demand perpetual war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Bring back the draft and cancel all military contracts that can be done with military personnel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That is the first step in ending war -remove the profiteering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. War is a racket.
Well, it’s a racket, all right. A few profit- and the many pay. But there is a way to stop it.
You can’t end it by disarmament conferences. You can’t eliminate it by peace parlays at
Geneva. Well-meaning but impractical groups can’t wipe it out by resolutions. It can be
smashed effectively only by taking the profit out of war.

-Brigadier General Smedley D. Butler, War is a Racket, p. 39
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
22. Amen, and end the "special circumstances" that allow most
"Elites" to avoid military service. No deferments (maybe a few if they are proven to be administered equally to wealthy and non-wealthy), no National Guard "hideouts", college deferments, etc..

If the affluent have to face the prospect of their child (almost ALL of the soldiers are children!! Man, I love (Kurt Vonnegut,Jr. and "The Children's Crusade" ).

We used to enforce laws against "War Profiteering", now "we" embrace it and consider it a huge part of our economy. YES, reinstate the draft, remove the exemptions and outlaw Mercenaries.

Our "wars" (against the poorest nations in the world) would end tomorrow. Skip and Buffy would never be exposed to the horrors of war. Wall street is waiting for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walerosco Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. +1000
Same way the TSA is not about security. Its all about enriching some multinational corporation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-11 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-11 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sick!
We need a total ban on military contractors. If we had contractors instead of Seabees and the Corp, we still might be fighting WWII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RussBLib Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-11 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
23. I thought Greenwald was going to say ...
...that the REPUBLICANS (and Christians) hate us (Democrats, free thinkers) because of our freedoms. It would almost be apropos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC