Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Inside the October Surprise Cover-up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:24 AM
Original message
Inside the October Surprise Cover-up

from Consortium News:



Inside the October Surprise Cover-up

Special Report: The George H.W. Bush Library in Texas has just released thousands of pages of documents on the October Surprise mystery, revealing how Bush’s inner circle handled allegations that the Reagan-Bush campaign in 1980 struck a treacherous deal with Iran. It was a textbook case of controlling the narrative, reports Robert Parry.

By Robert Parry
July 12, 2011


In 1991-92, when President George H.W. Bush’s reelection campaign was threatened by interlocking national security scandals, his White House staff and Republicans in Congress went into partisan battle mode determined to discredit – not investigate – allegations of wrongdoing, newly released documents from Bush’s presidential library reveal.

The documents show that GOP anger boiled over in 1991 when the long-running Iran-Contra scandal opened another front with allegations that secret Republican contacts with Iran extended back to 1980 when Ronald Reagan was seeking to unseat Democratic President Jimmy Carter – and Bush was Reagan’s vice presidential running mate.

Republicans were alarmed that Bush might be implicated in a secret – arguably treasonous – deal with Iran, struck behind President Carter’s back when Carter’s own reelection in 1980 hinged on whether he could gain freedom for 52 American hostages being held by Iranian radicals.

The archived White House documents, which were released in response to a Freedom of Information Act request, reveal a coordinated strategy between Bush’s Executive Branch and congressional Republicans to disrupt, delay and destroy the so-called October Surprise investigation. ...............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://consortiumnews.com/2011/07/12/inside-the-october-surprise-cover-up/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Repug perfidy has no boundaries. . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Republicon treason
Why do Republicons HATE America, and perpetrate treason against the USA?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxVietVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. The conservanazis will do anything to grab power in the US.
They want absolute power. Treason is not in their vocabulary to identify their own actions. Treason is to be used against their oppostition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Not just in the US. Just look at Murdoch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ineeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. I remember that well.
And I remember thinking/saying that if candidate Reagan had a surefire, secret plan to gain the hostages' release, which is what he claimed, it was inhumane if not downright unAmerican and treasonous to hold off those plans just to 'guarantee' his election. It boggled my mind that others didn't see it the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. A must-read just for the analysis of Republican cover-up tactics
These tactics were used to limit and block thorough investigation and prosecution of crimes in the Iran-Contra scandal, to push through Clarence Thomas and other conservative activists onto the Supreme Court, to shut down opposition that might have stopped W's neconservative joyride wars (hell, to get Bush into office), and to gin up and perpetuate a rolling list of scandals and "outrages" for Clinton and Obama.

This is how conservative movement activists have been shaping the Washington "conventional wisdom" for decades, without any effective counter by liberals (or anyone not on board with the conservative movement, for that matter). It's a very real part of what has happened to this country and what continues to happen to it.

And an important part in fighting it is simply understanding that it is happening, that there are people pushing hard to control the spin to limit damage that should destroy them, and it's not simply the flow of events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. We should also thank a compliant Dem panel head: Lee Hamilton. Yes, that Lee Hamilton
And a very complacent, lapdancing "liberal" media, who went right along with the WH's framing of the story.

Here are some more extracts from the article:

White House “talking points” on the October Surprise investigation urged restricting the inquiry to 1979-80 and imposing strict time limits for issuing its findings.

“Alleged facts have to do with 1979-80 – no apparent reason for jurisdiction/subpoena power to extend beyond,” the document said. “There is no sunset provision – this could drag on like Walsh!” – a reference to Iran-Contra special prosecutor Lawrence Walsh.

However, the key to understanding the October Surprise case was that it appeared to be a prequel to the Iran-Contra scandal, with the release of the American hostages immediately after Ronald Reagan’s inauguration on Jan. 20, 1981, followed by mysterious U.S. government approval of secret arms shipments to Iran via Israel. In other words, the two scandals blended together as one narrative; they were not two separate stories.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Hamilton, recognizing how nasty the Republican reaction would be,"
It wasn’t until December 1992 – a month after Bush lost to Bill Clinton – that the floodgates on October Surprise evidence finally began to open.

Years later, Task Force chief counsel Barcella told me that so much new evidence poured in that final month implicating the Republicans that he asked Hamilton to extend the investigation three more months. But Hamilton, recognizing how nasty the Republican reaction would be, turned down the extension request, Barcella said.


Good ol' Lee Hamilton. A natural choice for the 9/11 Commission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Mining of the Harbors in Nicaragua
An Act of War.

Poppy was the Ramrod on that project too.

There's lots more.

I told them at the time: "You people are out of your fucking minds. Congress is going to cut our Balls off when they find out!!"

The rest is History.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well their attempts to obfuscate, distort, insert plausible denial, delay, etc.
apparently worked. Hardly anyone would treat anyone claiming the October Surprise, to be anything other a lucky coincidence and nice jester from Iran to the new Reagan Administration, as anything other than a raving lunatic. It worked quite well - damn bastards get away with murder and never have to face up to what the really do and who they really are. Now, it is just a footnote in history but it changed the course of things in the country much much to worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Some dare not call it treason: some dare not call blatantly unconstitutional
acts severely harming America treason. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. Treason, like Iran-Contra.. Those fuckers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreamnightwind Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
13. Wow, thanks for this.
Edited on Thu Jul-14-11 02:18 AM by dreamnightwind
I had my political awakening in the 80's trying to get to the bottom of this scandal. I always thought, and still do, that the deal was made to delay release of the hostages to facilitate Reagan beating Carter. Over the years it's been incredibly discouraging seeing the lack of real investigation and how thorough the counter-spin is. I like to think that the truth will out, but in this case, as in JFK's murder, and others, the perps were true professionals with sufficient connections to get any act buried in history's basement.

It's made it pretty hard watching guys like Gates, who was up to his ears in this scandal, work for Obama.

Thanks for the OP, and thanks to the excellent Robert Parry for his persistence.

edited to remove an extra "the"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC