Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Seoul's double-talk on reunification"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:45 AM
Original message
"Seoul's double-talk on reunification"
Interesting article from Asia Times

Seoul's double-talk on reunification
By David Scofield, Jan. 4, 2005

Accusations of pro-North Korean sympathies, sit-ins, civil disobedience and the general chaos that have surrounded the Our Open Party's (OOP's) moves to abolish the National Security Law (NSL) may be just the beginning, as the expected abolition of the law could well presage a wider process to amend South Korea's constitution to conform with the OOP's (also known as the Uri Party's) pro-North Korea policies.

The NSL was initially designed to thwart attempts by North Korea to ideologically co-opt South Koreans, and it includes prohibitions and stiff penalties for those who extol the virtues of, accept payment from, and offer support to the North Korean system. Of course, supporting North Korea or even advocating North Korea's political beliefs is certainly no longer taboo in South Korea. Indeed, pro-North Korea activities, under the guise of pro-reconciliation initiatives, now receive popular support and substantial government largesse. That the NSL is an anachronism in South Korea is obvious, but the changes will likely not stop there. The OOP expects to repeal the law this month, though the opposition is fighting it tooth and nail.

<snip>

South Korean manufacturers can hardly contain their excitement these days at the prospect of using North Korea labor at a mere $57.50 per month ($7.50 of that reportedly goes to the Dear Leader's cognac fund) - the negotiated rate at the recently opened Gaeseong Industrial Complex in North Korea. Gaeseong, a symbol of Korean economic brotherhood, is just across the border in the North, where South Korean firms have established light manufacturing firms using North Korean labor. But since these workers are legally "South Koreans", as specified by the ROK constitution covering the entire peninsula with extended legal jurisdiction, then would it not be illegal to pay them salaries amounting to less than a tenth the nationally defined minimum wage?


http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Korea/GA04Dg01.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC