Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nearly 29% of inaguration costs to be borne by tax payers.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:19 PM
Original message
Nearly 29% of inaguration costs to be borne by tax payers.
Edited on Sat Jan-15-05 01:05 PM by dmordue
12million/52 million total is tax payer contribution.. Since the money is to come from D.C. Homeland security funds - Federally dispatched - it is actually all tax payers and not just D.C. You and I are paying for the inaguration with our tax dollars.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5445086/

Washington, D.C. is getting ready for one heck of a party next week. President Bush's second inauguration will be the most expensive and elaborate in American history. Fine by me. 

But I was thunderstruck today when I saw this quote from the administration's inauguration spokesperson: "We recognize this time that we are a nation at war."

Huh?  Next week's festivities will include 9 inaugural balls, a huge youth concert, a  massive parade, and an unprecedented fireworks display, etc. The cost will be $40 million.

I do find it a bit peculiar, however, that when it comes to the separate security costs of the inauguration... the Bush administration is telling Washington, D.C. that the city is on it's own.

As reported earlier this week in "The Washington Post," the Bush administration wants Washington, D.C., for the first time in inauguration history, to pay all of its own expenses.  This move will cost Washington, D.C. an estimated $12 million. The administration has told D.C. that in order to pay for next week's police overtime, security fences, and bleachers.... the city should dip into homeland security funds allocated for hospitals, firefighting equipment, and transit command centers. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, if left up to DC, couldn't they just send one extra cop and say
"sorry, that's all we're paying for"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
djeseru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because 9 out of 10 voted for Kerry in DC?
The BFEE wants to make sure they "pay" for their voting "mistake."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, in reality, the cost of the inauguration is $52 million
$4o million for the parties, $12 million to keep us proles at bay.

Think we'll ever see the $52 million figure referenced in the MSM?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Nearly 29% of inaguration costs to be borne by tax payers.
Edited on Sat Jan-15-05 12:43 PM by dmordue
I'd like to see that in the main stream media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's quite a contrast with the way it's being framed currently.
The meme out there now is that the inauguration is "being paid for by donations."

:grr:

Think I'll head over to the ol' DU Media Blaster.

Anyone care to join me? :)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/cu/cu.php?az=blaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks for the invitation. I'll join the party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneold1-4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Crawford TX
The inauguration could have been held right at the ranch, where he will be hiding out for most of the next 4 years. All the money for security should have been paid for by Crawford and Texas.
They could have opened the gates to Mexico and invited all who would willingly enlist in US army, and give them a ringside seat on the south pasture!
52 million could give every Mexican enlistee a couple of grand to send home to family and help their countries economy too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC