Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WMD do exist---Bush puts Country in Jeopardy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Lone Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 06:53 AM
Original message
WMD do exist---Bush puts Country in Jeopardy
Edited on Fri Aug-01-03 07:34 AM by The Lone Liberal
104 days since Iraqi war began and the Bush administration has not secured the Weapons of Mass Destruction. As late as June 9, 61 days ago Bush puts together the Iraqi Survey Group and dedicates only 1,400 people to the effort. That is a small contingency to be searching the entire country of Iraq.

This week Bush paid out $30 million to an informant who supplied information that lead to Udai and Qusai. There is a $25 million reward for Saddam Hussein. Yet to my knowledge there is not one penny dedicated towards a reward for the location of WMDs.

It is my charge that Bush has been derelict in his duty to protect this country. Simply because we do not know where the existing WMDs are located does not mean that there are not those who do. Because of the lackluster and lackadaisical approach to finding the weapons Bush has placed this country in danger of biological attack. As they told us over and over we may well find the weapons location when there is a mushroom cloud over one of our cities. It will be Bush who is to blame when it happens.

He did not urgently seek the location of the WMDs. He did not offer a reward for their location. He did not dedicate enough manpower to finding them. It is as if he wanted to allow enough time to pass so that they could be transferred to terrorist.

IMHO this is the argument. We accept what was said they do exist. If they exist then with each passing day and we did not find them we are at jeopardy of them being transferred to terrorist. Bush did not commit enough resources or energy to finding them. Bush is to blame for the terrorist having WMDs.


ON EDIT: The point is this: We take their statements on WMD for a fact, which leaves us not to argue they do or don’t exist. It leaves us with the charge that because so much time has passed due to ineffective planning and urgency that Bush has allowed them to pass to terrorist. If they are found how do we know that some of them were not passed to terrorist during the time it took Bush to find them. That is the argument. He was derelict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. A mushroom cloud over one of our cities ...
...gives Bush the perfect reason to declare martial law and cancel the 2004 election. Perhaps this is exactly what "they" want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. This point is more important
than whether or not we can prove Saddam had WMD's. Because this misadministration placed a higher priority on securing the oil wells, then it did on securing the known WMD sites, the danger of another terrorist attack has greatly increased.

Even if Saddam had WMD's, I would assume that by now they've already been sold on the black market or even EBay.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Lone Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That is the point. We accept that they did have WMDs
Bush is derelict because he did not commit the resources or the urgency to finding them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. The mere fact that efforts to locate such WMDs ...
... have been so superficial and unsuccessful is, IMHO, a demonstration that this madministration didn't believe its own lies.

There is no logical analysis, based on any assumptions whatsoever about the WMDs, that doesn't condemn this madministration's behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. TahitiNut Hits The Mark, Again
Your post, as usual, is on the mark. The disinterest in finding WMD's, and the PR spin that "we'll find them, eventually" or "it's not the weapons, but the program" is the empirical evidence that they knew there would be nothing to find from day one.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romey Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is Kay's so-called "evidence"
according to this article in Chicago-Sun Times...

That evidence included documents detailing how to conceal arms plants as commercial facilities, and for restarting weapons production once the coast was clear, officials told reporters.

http://www.suntimes.com/output/iraq/cst-nws-wmd01.html

What a load of crap!!:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I bet the documents are written
in broken English.

/sarcasm off/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I wonder about the concealing weapons plants thing
Is it possible that a country or terrorist group might disguise a weapons factory as a pharmacuetical plant? But not in Iraq, in Sudan about 5 years ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewGuy Donating Member (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. We have been off message
for so long on WMD it would look like a flip flop to suddenly begin to believe in the very WMD we have denied the existence of. However, this is not only a better poeition to take politically, but also a safer one for the nation.

These WMD were eyeballed by the inspectors soon after the first gulf war ended. They existed then and probably do now since Saddam would not have been likely to deny access to inspectors if what they would find was that the weapons had been destroyed. They almost certainly still exist and will either be found in Iraq, which would be good news for America and Bush, or they are in Syria or some other unfreindly nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC