Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Flip Side: Why Wouldn't Democrats Think About Running Clark?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Composed Thinker Donating Member (874 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 02:10 PM
Original message
The Flip Side: Why Wouldn't Democrats Think About Running Clark?
It's the other side of the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let him declare he's running, and I'll think about it.
Until then, :boring:.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Composed Thinker Donating Member (874 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Fair enough
But is it too ridiculous to think there's something special about a guy if he's generating this much talk among certain people when he's not even a candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It makes me wonder about the people
in whom he's generating this much talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Composed Thinker Donating Member (874 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What do you mean?
Are you questioning the motives of people behind Clark, wondering if they really stand for Democratic values or are just interested in beating Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. The real party people
want someone with political experience in elective office. It is a different animal than any other CEO job, and it is one of the reasons the Eisenhower was so crappy at the job, and why Bush is so bad at it. Although by comparison Eisenhower was a human relations genius. It's not a dictator job, like general or CEO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Clark isn't committed to a party affiliation
He needs to quit riding the fence and declare his candicacy. If he is that indecisive, then I wouldn't be interested in supporting him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obsess much?
How hard can it be to put together those taking points?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC