Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Stern Show (today 3/5/04)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 06:57 AM
Original message
Howard Stern Show (today 3/5/04)
We started listening to Howard Wednesday after reading a thread here on DU.

This morning he said he is going to reveal information as to why his show is doomed, and may no longer be on the air after next week. He has also spoke of the culture war in the US, and how the minority of the religious right and Bush* is taking over. Right now he is saying our country is dangerously close to be no different than Iran, etc., how we have lost our freedoms .... etc.

Tune in if you can. In the NYC area, it's 92.3FM. He's in the fight against Bush* mode.

You may be able to find a broadcast station here, which is how I found him:
http://www.koam.com/list.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. he's got a source/friend at the FCC
telling him the sh** is hitting the fan soon. His time is short.

he's reading this story:

http://www.quicken.com/investments/news_center/story/?story=NewsStory/dowJones/20040305/ON200403050405000148.var&column=P0DFP


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
50. hardly a secret...
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=ao7f1SmQRTug&refer=us

FCC Planning Two Dozen Indecency Fines Against Radio (Update2)
March 5 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Communications Commission is close to levying about two dozen fines for indecency against radio companies, including Viacom Inc.'s Infinity Broadcasting and Clear Channel Communications Inc., FCC documents show.

``At the end of 2003, we had pending more than two dozen cases in the final stage of investigation, and anticipate enforcement action in all or most of these cases within the next few months,'' FCC Chairman Michael Powell said in a letter to Representative John Dingell, a Michigan Democrat. The March 2 letter was released today.

One show that has been the target of complaints is shock jock Howard Stern's program, produced by New York-based Viacom, said FCC spokeswoman Suzanne Tetreault. The FCC has given preliminary notice that it intends to impose fines against San Antonio-based Clear Channel, the biggest U.S. radio broadcaster, and Indianapolis-based Emmis Communications Inc.

snip

The FCC's biggest indecency fine ever was the $1.7 million levied in 1995 on Infinity for material on the Stern show. Shares of Clear Channel fell 33 cents to $44.63 at 11:54 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. Viacom rose 6 cents to $40.63. Emmis slipped 17 cents to $25.63 in Nasdaq Stock Market composite trading.

The FCC's intention to impose additional fines on radio companies was reported in this morning's Wall Street Journal.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dno Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. He's saying Vote for Kerry!
He's asking his 17 million listeners to vote bush out of office!!
This is so kool! Check out the picture on www.horardstern.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dno Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sorry
The link is www.howardstern.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Is there more to his website?
It just seems like a show like his would have more than a webpage with a picture and an email address on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
36. Looks like jsut a placeholder
Has been that way for years.

you'll have to go to the fan sites, like http://www.koam.com .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hope he can help rid us of these holier-than-thou hypocrites...
who spring into action when it comes to imposing their idea of morality on all of us, while dragging their feet on getting at the truth of 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Anyone know anything about the C Street Center?
six senators, including Sam Brownback of Kansas, are living in a home owned by this Center. It is disconcerting that members of Congress are given housing perks by this religious group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Here is an article from Harper's on that. Strange, strange stuff.
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 07:59 AM by CalamityJane
http://www.harpers.org/JesusPlusNothing.html

It doesn't really explain what the link is between the Senators that live there and the organization. I was surprised to read that John Baldacci lived there. He is currently the governor of Maine, a Democrat, and was a liberal congressmen while he was in Washington, so I don't know if some of them just live there or if there is an ideological link or not.

On edit: was Howard talking about this organization? What did he say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. he's right about the religious right
here are the details: How the Religious Right took over the Republican Party: http://www.TheocracyWatch.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Power of the government
He is saying that even if Infinity Broadcasting tries to go to court over imposed fines, (fining them for something apparently that happened months ago - I'm not really sure) the government will just shut them down.

Howard seems resigned to the fact that his show is over, and there is nothing that can be done, saying the whole system is rigged and the religious right has won, comparing the US to Iran.

I guess he is now seeing what we've known all along. Better late than never, I suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corgigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's all politics this morning
no wonder Bush and friends want him gone. Stern might be alot of things but he's not a dummy. No one stupid could have lasted in radio as long as he has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. And neither are his fans
one of whom I am. I have to listen on an illegal internet feed my friend in New England is sending me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. Hmmm....I might be interested in
hearing that feed, if someone would send it to me.

Not that I'm asking for something illegal. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
12. Stern Has Totally Seen The Light
He even said, "It's like the Matrix, I've taken the blue pill and now I see everything."

Absolutely slamming Bush and the religious funamentalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. It might be too late now.
Hopefully we've got another well-known spokesman on our hands, though, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
38. he has some explaining to do
not so much in order to apologize, but to provide insight as how one can stay in the dark for that long, and how one manages to find the light after all this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #38
51. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StlMo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. Despite differences many of us have with Stern, WE MUST TAKE A STAND

Free Speech is under attack - pure and simple.

WE MUST FIGHT THIS CENSORSHIP, GODDAMN IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
14. Can somebody tell me what Stern said about Sam Brownback and that
religious group that calls themselves "The Family," please? I posted an article from Harper's a few posts up. It is a very strange group with connections to high-powered lawmakers. The article is long, but interesting.

I'm curious to hear what Stern said about it and they don't have him in my area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. He Said
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 09:33 AM by Beetwasher
That they guy is part of of some secret group and living in housing provided by a religious group that is funded by secret donors. As a lawmaker this is a conflict of interest. He said this guy has a secret radical religious agenda that is being implemented.

He compared this type of thing to the rise of the Nazi's and fascism. He said the Nazi's also set up these secret cells groups of radicals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Right, and
he also mentioned that he was told not to talk about them, and briefly said that it may be dangerous to him to continue.

Thanks for the link, Calamity Jane. I've been trying to google some of the things mentioned in the link, to see what I can find out. In my mind, this is a special interest group because it involves money and power. If you find something, please share.

On another note, Stern said he couldn't sleep last night because of what is going down, and in an earlier thread, I said he seemed resigned, and there was nothing he could do to fight this. As the program continues, he appears to becoming more energized - I think from his listeners.

He mentioned a web site that was started in his defense, did anyone catch what site that is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. He said one of the guys in that house called Mel Karmazin
President of Viacom. Asked why he is broadcasting indecency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #20
42. Thanks all of you
I don't recall having seen anything else about this group than this article. They sound very theocratic, judging from the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
16. in a related act of repression | NYT removes Ted Rall

NEW YORK—NYTimes.com said it canceled the use of Ted Rall's editorial cartoons effective March 1 because they didn't fit "the tone" of the popular Web site.

When asked why the decision was made, New York Times Digital Spokesperson Christine Mohan said in an e-mail: "After two years of monitoring cartoons by Ted Rall we decided that, while he often does good work, we found some of his humor was not in keeping with the tone we try to set for NYTimes.com ... While NYTimes.com and its parent company support the right of free expression, we also recognize an obligation to assure our users that what we publish, no matter what its origin, does not offend the reasonable sensibilities of our audience."

much more on Rall's blog here:

http://www.tedrall.com/rants.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corgigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. does not offend the reasonable sensibilities of our audience."
What a bunch of crap. Don't forget the book burning tour showing soon at a local Walmart near you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. He's been telling the truth.
Some of the best articles I've seen written recently have been written by Ted Rall. This is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. Ted Rall is a scumbag
he's right up there with Ramsey Clark of leftists who give a bad name to the left.

Utter garbage. He's a loon and a hypocrite, and an anti-patriot. A person who advocates for those who murder American soldiers in Iraq, and someone who berates the families of 9-11 victems should have his testicels ripped off if he has any, much less not be published in the vanguard of all American newspapers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Free Speech
is about protecting the rights of people to say things that may make your blood boil. And I think you are missing the tone of Rall entirely and not getting the point of some of his cartoons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #33
39. The times is justified in looking for new talent by canning that idiot
They are the premier newssource in America. And there is really little to suggest that he was helping them at all.

It's not even anything close to having congress force it's hand at political censorship of the number one radio personality in the country. It's not in the same stratosphere.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. We cannot selectively defend free speach.
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 11:29 AM by K-W
We are talking about a website here. They certainly could have added new talent without dropping Rall. Now if they can show that they were actually losing readership, and that Ralls comics were offensive and/or didnt entertain people enough for them to read it. If the hits were way down on his pagesr or something like that, that is one thing.

If he has just been the target of conservative complaints because he is a liberal and thats why he was canned it is utterly inappropriate and we cant just let it slide because we think his point of view isnt right.

I looked at the three comics linked to in his blog and, while I can see how they might disturb some people, they certainly dont strike me as aweful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #33
52. free speech does not mean protecting the fat paychecks of assholes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StlMo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. For much more info about Clear Channel, go to Salon's Clear Channel site:

Radio's big bully


A complete guide to Salon's reporting on Clear Channel, the most powerful -- and some would say pernicious -- force in the music industry.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
For the past few months, Salon reporter Eric Boehlert has been tracking the story of Clear Channel Communications, the little-noticed media giant that has quietly taken over the country's radio and concert industries.

The company owns nearly 1,200 radio stations and effectively controls the rock radio market. It also owns SFX Entertainment, the nation's dominant concert-venue owner and touring promoter.

...

http://www.salon.com/ent/clear_channel/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Narcissistic jock has no interest in free speech
Over the last few years Stern has been noticeably missing in the fight with the FCC and patriot act.
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StlMo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. It doesn't matter whose free speech it is -

If we don't fight threats to free speech where we find them,
those threats will some day find us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Papa Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. EXACTLY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. We've been trying to wake people up for the past 3 years
he finally woke up. What's wrong with that? Are we on the left not to embrace those who are finally waking up? I say, "welcome aboard, Howard!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. Do you even know what "narcissist" means?Stern is the complete opposite
This is a guy who is completely self deprecating about everything regarding his acctractivness or lack thereof
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeffrey_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
28. what a crock of shit
Take Stern off the air, but yet allow garbage like Jerry Springer, Temptation Island and other morally corrupt shows to pollute the air ways. American Hypocrisy at its finest!

Fuck you Bush*!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #28
45. You forget the admitted drug addict and rat bastard rush limpballs
who had the audacity to coerce his maid to score for him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StlMo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
31. Clear Channel & The White House: A tale of two Texas dynasties

Clear Channel & The White House: A tale of two Texas dynasties


Another Texas dynasty with political influence on par with the media influence of Clear Channel is that of the George Bush family. Former president George Bush senior, and two sons -- current president George W. Bush, and the less-visible governor of Florida, Jeb Bush. Unfortunately, the ties between the two families don't end with nepotism, their home state of Texas, or a common goal of world domination.

Political donations by US television and radio stations almost doubled in the last year and Clear Channel was among the the Republican party's most generous financiers. The Republicans have also received significant sums from NBC, Fox TV and News Corporation. All four companies were veritable cheerleaders for the war in Iraq.

Consider the following from UK-based radio2xs.com:

Clear Channel's founder, Lowry Mays, ensured the majority of the half-a-million dollar donations made in 2001/02 landed in the Republican party's coffers. His company's links with the Bush family run deeper, as media watchdog takebackthemedia.com showed when it recently published the elaborate web of connections that further align Clear Channel with the Bush family. Mays, who took advantage of radio deregulation and transformed Clear Channel into a global multimedia player, is associated with the president through the University of Texas Investment Management Company (UTIMCO). Mays sits on the governing board, alongside Clear Channel vice-chairman Thomas Hicks, whose family is believed to have contributed over 500,000 dollars to Bush campaigns over the years.

Hicks, a long-time friend and supporter of President Bush, heads the UTIMCO board but his position was recently embroiled in controversy when it emerged he awarded UTIMCO-funded contracts to firms politically associated with the Bush dynasty. Hicks also bought the Texas Rangers (baseball) team from Bush for $250 million in 1998 - three times the amount that Bush and his partners had originally paid.

...

http://www.ask-steve.com/2003/06/clear_channel_t.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. Thanks, StlMo
This should just piss all American's off. If the FCC seriously and honestly cared about our airwaves, they would not allow this collusion. Sadly, they collude with them, hurting the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karabekian Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
32. so people suddenly like him
just because they hear he is bashing Bush, I think a lot of his views on the world would be unpopular here. I would probably classify him as a libertarian and opposed to much of what is championed here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. i don't think he is opposed to free speech
Also it isn't so much a matter of liking the man as it is a matter of him doing the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #32
41. I don't see why a person has to agree with me for me to like them
I know lots of people that I don't agree with, but I still like them. I have always found Stern funny, even though I don't always agree with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #32
47. I Don't Like Him -- But I Don't Like BushCo Censorship
and I'm not gonna wait around for it to happen to "someone I like.." actually it already has!

I'm glad to have Howard Stern or whoever else blow a whistle on their agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
56. The enemy of my enemy is my friend
I think Churchill was in the same position when Germany attacked Russia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
34. I don't think it's a good idea to pick on Howard
He has a large audience and they are likely to be very irate if he is taken off the air. I predict the removal of Stern from the airwaves could be a turning point for an element of people previously uninvolved in politics.


Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #34
40. Exactly...
... if they do manage to get Stern off the air, I think they will live to see the day they realize that was their undoing.

But on the other hand, if Stern stays on the air, he will swing the election to Kerry. 18 million loyal listeners is a lot. If he can change only a fraction of them to vote Kerry, Bush* is done.

The enemies of free speech are going to lose in the long run either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
48. Excellent Point Cher
I think they will live to regret this ploy -- it might enlighten a lot of people to the reall effect that the control freaks at BushCo have on EVERYONE....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #34
49. I was so surprised
I'd been a casual fan, tuning in occasionally on my way to work, but tuning out in disgust when the topic shifted to politics, since he's maintained a wholly uninformed, vapid "love it or leave it" sort of pro-Bush, pro-war disposition until waking up recently, after which, to my astonishment (after being out of the country a couple weeks) I hear him praising the likes of Michael Moore and Nader. I thought I'd flown through a vortex. How tragically ludicrous such a conversion has led to this persecution/suppression (and so quickly!). what bullshit. At least we'll either have a potent ally with a large fan base on the air, or at least a martyr who's proscription will anger and enfranchise a lot of marginalized people. Stick up for Howard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #34
53. This is likely to backfire
like picking on Mayor Street did last November before the Philly mayoral elections. People who didn't like Street rallied behind him in droves because he, and they, saw through the bogus investigations and saw instead the misuse of power.

I think this is a recipe for disaster for them. I'm hoping so anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StlMo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
35. More Links To Clear Channel's Agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
44. I'm offended by Rush Limbaugh's overt "hate speech" when will
he be taken off the air????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
54. Check out these links to faux news...
...mancow is blaming the "criminal liberal media" for it.

click here and scroll to the bottom right of the page and it's under "Mancow is worried about the freedom of speech"

While there check out the creepy little brainwashing case called "Meet the littlest Fox Fan!"

wow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindoctor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
55. The simple problem with ClearChannel
The matter is really quite simple.
ClearChannel needs FCC regulation to change in order for it to grow any further than it is today. If any of its shows offend the Administration and subsequently influence the climate in the FCC, they will pull the plug on it.

That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. True, but it's not just Clear Channel anymore.
They are going after Infinity as well. Stern said today that if Infinity tries to fight the fines, the collusion between Bush*, the right wing religous sectors, and Powell's FCC will shut Infinity, or anyone else down. They want his Bush dissent off the air, using, all of a sudden, his shock-jock antics as the reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 17th 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC