Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Gabriel Over The White House" just finished on Turner. Disappointment.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 11:15 AM
Original message
"Gabriel Over The White House" just finished on Turner. Disappointment.
Things were going well up to the halfway mark. The President woke from a coma and decided to put the jobless to work, supported the leader of an army of unemployed, fired his cabinet, etc. Congress was ready to impeach him and he stood up to them.

Then it all went downhill for me. First, the President declared martial law, Congress suspended itself, and it was effectively a dictatorship, not a democracy.

Then the President went after organized crime by ignoring constitutional and civil rights of a gangster. (I know, I know, but the gangster is still an American citizen.) The President first demanded that the gangster return to his country of origin. When the gangster refused, the President created a "federal police" with armored tanks that openly fired on the gangster's warehouse. Ultimately there was a kangaroo military court, not a civilian court that quickly convicted the gangster and his minions and they were quickly executed via firing squad. (I'm not making this up!)

Finally, the President gathered all heads of foreign countries and demanded that they cough up their money they owed on their war debts to the U.S. They said that they couldn't afford to pay. OK, said the President. Then I'll break our promise to you via an international treaty and build the world's largest navy in order to achieve peace in order to return to prosperity. Yep, blackmail.

This led to a "happy" ending wherein the leaders agreed to sign a world disarmament treaty and promised war no more.

Author! Author! Geez, I thought this movie had real potential. Like "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" without the sentimentality. But this is fascism in disguise of democracy. I should have expected so much if W.R. Hearst produced this film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. I turned it off after the Marshall Law part. I decided..
I didn't care what good he was trying to accomplish, it just reminded me a lil' too much of the current misadministration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcwayne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Except the current administration doesn't give a damn about the unemployed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'd love to see that movie! It's a notorious piece of American fascist
propaganda, made in reaction to the New Deal. I wonder what the New Deal revisionists who think FDR was essentially "conservative" would say about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Apparently the movie came out before Roosevelt and the New Deal.
That's what makes it more intriguing.

Like I said, it starts out like "Mr. Deeds Comes to Town" and "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" (both Capra compositions), but it ends up like "It Can't Happen Here." You go, "Hey, wait a minute. What just happened?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. What year was it made?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Made in 1932 but distributed in 1933.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Very interesting indeed.
Mayer actually thought it was an attack on Hoover! (Which it probably was.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. i saw part of it
his secretary said she didn't know much about religion and then goes on to explain gabriel. it seemed she knew quite a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 20th 2024, 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC