Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did today signal the death of NATO and isolation for the USA?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 11:52 PM
Original message
Did today signal the death of NATO and isolation for the USA?
Will the US become isolated militarily and diplomatically, since the result of the Spanish election suggests that if a country backs an American war and it is attacked by Al-Qaeda the government will be toppled? Will any government risk its survival again by defying the will of its people and backing an American war? Will NATO become meaningless?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Depends if the Usurper can feign a win
Edited on Mon Mar-15-04 12:15 AM by Must_B_Free
It's not the US that everyone is pissed with. It is the Neocons. Just ecause the Neocons have driven this nation into the ditch, it does not tarnish us permanantly as long as we can get rid of them.

Everyone knows we got hijacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. True
But will the US get any support for any war next time, even if we have a sane president, given the high cost of support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. that presumes
that if democrats get elected, that they stand down in the war of
empire to conquor the world through overt or covert means.

The USA's methods of interventionist neoliberalism and superpower-self-aggrandizement has lead to dangerous imperialism... under
both democratic and republican governments.

This militarism is our undoing. I don't see the democrats standign
down on this. Well, then the USA will stay hated, just less so.

The president who reigns in the military to the USA's borders and
comes back to sanity in this new arms race will gain some respect
only depending on his move with empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. NATO will not become meaningless but European politicians
will think twice about supporting a policy that the vast majority of their citizens CLEARLY oppose.

Will this lead to further isolationism and possibly into the continuous war of Orwell's imaginings? Could very well happen, except that business will lose money that way so I can't really see it being allowed to happen.

We may see a resumption of the old "Yankee Go Home" campaigns again, especially in Europe but also in Latin and South America and Africa.

And who do we have to blame for this but the cowboys in D.C.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. "Yankee Go Home"
I am not familiar with those campaigns. Can you enlighten me on that front?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Back in the 50's, and all over the world, there were demonstrations
Edited on Mon Mar-15-04 01:00 AM by mikehiggins
calling for us Yankees to go home. South and Central America were notorious for them (something about a century of interference in their nations or something like that). Vice President Nixon even got his convoy tomatoed I beleive.

I'd have to look it up to get critical cites but generally all of them were dismissed as Communist inspired and part of the world-wide Red Menace. The idea that there might be other reasons for those cute little brown and black and yellow people not to like us really wasn't considered until Viet Nam.

People in other countries seem to have a much clearer idea of what American capitalism has meant to their own countries than people in our country do. Amazing.

Edited to add this: if you go to Ask Jeeves and type in Yankee Go Home you'll get a wide range of commentary on this idea (first put forth, apparently, by Mark Twain regarding the Spanish-American War). And they threw eggs at Nixon, not tomatoes. Happened in Equador.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WaywardSon Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Get ready for more attacks...
They have found out that a terrorist strike can/may affect an election. This isn't just about * anymore. It won't matter who is in office now. Once you give into terror, they have you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. So, let me get this straight...
Any country that suffers a terrorist attack, must in the next election vote for the incumbents -- the ones who, by definition, failed to protect them. Otherwise, they are giving in to the terrorists. That about sum it up?

Puhleeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Good point
That's why I see through everything that comes out of the Bush Administration - I refuse to submit to BFEE terror!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. That's one hundred percent correct.
Too bad Ronald Reagon negotiated with terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. What they may have found
is that a government sticking to its own version of reality, rather than admitting the known facts, is liable to get booted out.

So maybe the effect will be more honest governments. But I won't hold my breath for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-04 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. Spanish Socialist: "Blair is a complete dickhead"
Watch that Spanish-British relationship fly!

Tony Blair has been called "a complete dickhead" by a leading Spanish politician live on television. The comment was made by Jose Bono, one of the three most powerful figures in the Socialist Party. His remarks were not intended to be heard, but were recorded by a television team while he was talking to Joaquin Almunia, a former Socialist leader.

Mr Bono said: "Hey, and our colleague Blair? He's a complete dickhead (un gilipollas integral). He's an imbecile."

The comments contrast with the Spanish prime minister Jose Maria Aznar's carefully cultivated friendship with Mr Blair and will embarrass the Socialists.

The party is irritated by Mr Blair's friendship with Mr Aznar and dislikes the resulting Anglo-Spanish alliance.

There is little question that were Spain's conservatives to lose power, the London-Madrid axis would collapse.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/01/16/wspain16.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 21st 2024, 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC