Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reagan/Bush and Iran Hostages

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mcd1982 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 09:07 PM
Original message
Reagan/Bush and Iran Hostages
I remember reading somewhere recently -- I wish I could remember where-- that Reagan and Bush Sr. had negotiated with the Iranians to release the hostages after Reagan had been securely sworn into office in 1981.

Is there any validity to this? I'd not heard it before...

Matthew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure. Look here...
Edited on Sun Aug-03-03 09:10 PM by wyldwolf
http://www.consortiumnews.com/archive/xfile.html

or...

Just google "October Surprise"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kainah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's the original "October Surprise"
Is there any validity to it? It's one of those where you have to put on your :tinfoilhat: and decide for yourself. If you search "Reagan Bush Iran October Surprise" I'll bet it would kick up plenty. An author named Barbara Honegger (not sure spelling is right) wrote a book about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptainMidnight Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. no tin foil hat here!
It's been pretty much proven.

Conveniently, many year after the fact!

Notice how Republicans have to keep stealing elections to win?

Captain Mike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kainah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I just meant that it is a "conspiracy theory"
I wasn't casting aspersions on it. I'm fond of my :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. "had negotiated with the Iranians to release"
Edited on Sun Aug-03-03 09:22 PM by syrinx9999
The key is that they made a deal for them NOT to release them before the election.

Bushes commit treason for a living, let there be no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting facts that point to it being true never followed up
Edited on Sun Aug-03-03 09:25 PM by papau
GOP folks Hotel bills in Paris - folks missing at events/times - even folks saying directly that the GOP agreed with Iran to prevent Hostage release until Reagan said the magic words on 1/20 - and the curious fact that the plane out of Iran was held up on the runway until the proper moment.

Even have a bit of data that may indicate George H W Bush was bagman for the operation.

Is there any validity to this? - Well - it can be fun to write a book on this type of thing - but without FBI/CIA/GOP documents and confessions the validity will always be in question. And if you do regime change to the folks on the other side of the deal and the folks that -friends or not - travel in their circle - with no one at the top surviving, you tend to lose witnesses from the other side.

As syrinx9999 said above "The key is that they made a deal for them NOT to release them before the election. Bushes commit treason for a living, let there be no doubt." - which may explain why it was never followed up!

:-)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The best documentation thus far...
... to suggest, at the very least, that something was awry, is that someone, Secret Service or otherwise, phonied up George H.W. Bush's Secret Service logs for the weekend of Oct. 19th, 1980. A reporter had sufficient curiosity to check Barbara Bush's Secret Service logs and they were at great variance with what was in G.H.W.B.'s, and also interviewed Potter Stewart's widow about visits by the Bushes on that weekend. Robert Parry details it very well.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jagguy Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. never prooven but...
... one of the first things that George Jr did was extend the period of classification for certain records (oddly enough encompassing this timeframe) for an additional, I beleive, 25 years (might have been a little more).

This has the effect of extending "protection" not only past the expected life expectancy of Sr but Jr as well.

Does it mean anything ? You can form your own opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, that's a more recent EO...
... the very first order extended privileges to both presidents and VPs to have records withheld at their discretion, exempted from the requirements of the 1978 Presidential Records Act.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It's all right here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC