Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ashcroft now trying to censor profanity in newspaper comic strips

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 11:41 PM
Original message
Ashcroft now trying to censor profanity in newspaper comic strips
"A cartoonist says that Ashcroft has been leaning on States' Attorney General Offices to lean on weekly papers to clean up the foul language within."

http://atrios.blogspot.com/2004_03_14_atrios_archive.html#107973907708528242

Here's the post from the cartoonist - he originally erroneously thought this was coming from the FCC. Turns out Ashcroft is pressuing State Attorney Generals to do the censoring.
http://www.tcj.com/messboard/ubb/Forum1/HTML/007059.html
http://www.longstoryshortpier.com/vaults/2004/03/19/we_are_so_fucked_some_more

One suggestion: Notify Howard Stern about this. This is EXACTLY the kind of freedom-of-speech stuff that drives him nuts and makes him start ranting and telling people to vote against Bush.

Send an email to Howard:
http://www.howardstern.com/
sternshow@howardstern.com

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. A DIRECT VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT!
This prooves that our opponents are:

Enemy's of Freedom
Tyrants
Fascists

....and all other terms that apply to this band of
thugs!

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drthais Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. this is from David Letterman's
'Museum of the Hard to Believe'
remember that?

JUST amazing....
these people really need to get a life

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadProphetMargin Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, I for one am glad that John "anything for a laugh" Ashcroft has
not allowed terrorism to distract him from the REAL dangers facing this nation, like dirty words and boobs.

UNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNGH!

Sorry, I seem to have been channelling Bob Boudelang for a minute there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alenne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm glad Ashcroft has his priorities straight.
The F bomb has got to be the biggest problem facing the US right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. What the Fuc*
do you mean :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. not sure that word belongs in a comic strip
But for the Attourney General to interviene is totally unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Who decides?
What if Eve Ensler (author of "The Vagina Monologues") used the word "cunt" in a performance or comic strip?

I know some words are shocking, and mayb some community pressure (not buying the paper?) could be brought to bear on publications people don't like.

But as you imply, not buying a paper is one thing - criminalizing is another thing.

We need to realize WHY this stuff is happening - nobody wants Bush anymore, so their only hope now is rigging the voting machines and censoring the media.

Either we have a First Amendment, or we don't. This is just a test case to see if the people can be lulled into censoring certain things. Later, they'll expand this to censor lots of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadProphetMargin Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. That is the correct answer.
Give that man a ceeegar!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Right, I just meant
that I wouldn't have done it, and it doesn't seem entirely appropriate for something in between peanuts and garfield, much like I would hope sponge bob square pants would never call anyone a cunt. But, I'm not nearly so sensative that I would even consider boycotting the paper or probably even think about it for over 5 seconds, much less try to ban it like our dear archbishop Ashcroft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. I am unconvinced this happened.
I am unconvinced this happened.

Not one assistant Attorney General who supposedly sent such a letter is named.

And there is no law against publishing profane words an assistant Attorney General could cite.

So I doubt this happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Medical privacy laws haven't stopped him from subpoenaing medical records
Right now, Ashcroft is trying to put together a list of ALL DOCTORS who do ANY abortions (not just late ones).

There's no law that allows him to do it. But that's never stopped Ashcroft.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. laws never stopped them before
I bet you would be shocked at the lists they have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustiPatriotiated Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Shouldn't he be fending off evil kidney stones or something right now?
I'm sure glad he is policing the comics for language. NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 03:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. I agree! Blonde is nothing but Marxist trash!
All hail the comic czar!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 20th 2024, 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC