Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seen on Headline News: White House official accused of trying to keep...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 06:49 AM
Original message
Seen on Headline News: White House official accused of trying to keep...
...Nigergate quiet?

I only caught this for a second, but I'm fairly certain it said something to this effect. Did anyone else see this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
searchingforlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Usually they play it again in the next hour. I will watch. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Over weekend no US Media play of Pres of Niger Statement

http://www.boston.com/dailynews/215/world/Niger_demands_formal_exonerati:.shtml

Niger demands formal exoneration of Bush's Iraq-uranium allegation
By Associated Press, 8/3/2003 10:39

NIAMEY, Niger (AP) Niger's president demanded the U.N. nuclear agency exonerate it of any claims it had any uranium dealings with Iraq, a widely discounted accusation included in President Bush state of the union address. Ahead of the U.S.-led of invasion of Iraq, Bush said British intelligence possessed a document showing that Iraq had approached Niger to obtain uranium. The claim was used to suggest Iraq was pursuing a nuclear weapons program. U.N. officials have called the document a forgery, and Bush administration officials have since said it should not have been cited in the president's speech. ''This affair represents nothing other than accusations without foundation,'' Niger President Mamadou Tandja said in a televised address late Saturday in the arid West African nation. The Vienna-based U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency should ''publicly wash Niger of all suspicions before the U.N. Security Council,'' Tandja declared.

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/html/20030803T210000-0500_47138_OBS_NIGERIA_IGNORES_US_PRESSURE_TO_KEEP_OUT_OF_URANIUM_ROW.asp

Niger's president Mamadou Tandja, yesterday rejected the allegation by the US and Britain, which had formed part of their justification for war on Saddam Hussein. Tandja has demanded that the International Atomic Energy Agency, which he said had cleared his country of all suspicion at the United Nations, exonerate Niger of any claims that it had any uranium dealings with Iraq. According to reports in the British newspaper, Sunday Telegraph, Herman Cohen, a former US assistant secretary of state for Africa, last week called on Tandja in Niger's capital of Niamey, to relay Washington's message for Niger to keep out of the uranium row. The paper quoted senior Niger government officials.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=430315




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Several articles here on this lately.
Evidently the ambassador or Bush flunky HAD A FIRM GRIP on the Niger official as he told him to butt out of the controversy. It almost sounded like physical intimidation.

What passes for DIPLOMACY in this administration...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC