Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Heads Up Tweety Alert

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ivote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:01 PM
Original message
Heads Up Tweety Alert
He's stumbling already Tweety that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. the tweezer looks pretty serious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. yes he does
David Gregory doing pretty well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. why is he called Tweety?
Sorry if this makes me an idiot! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He looks like Tweety-Pie the bird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeller hair. He's a yeller and he has hair.
Like the Tweety Bird cartoon character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Comparison images of the two "tweeties" FYI


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Tweety is in the zone
I don't know who this idiot is -- he keeps trying to deflect questions.

But Tweety keeps bringing him back to the issues at hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. No matter what question Tweety asked
this guy wanted to get back to his talking points about the book. Now he's suggesting Clarke is a tin foil hatter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yeah -- he started off by attacking the release date of the book
I saw Clarke on PBS a little while ago.

Clarke said it was the White House lawyers who delayed the book by three months. They had to clear it to make sure no classified info was in the book.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Wilkinson is reciting the same prepared speech he gave on CNN
Even trying to act like it's off the cuff when he referred to the book as the X-Files and lokking for the book in the science fiction section of the bookstore. What a motor mouth. Tweety was even chuckling at the guy's delivery and not answering his direct questions.

I can't wait for the News Hour and it's more sober pace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. don't hold your breath......they let Bartlett get away unscathed
Ray Suarez allowed him to recite his talking points without questioning

there's a thread here on this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. There seems to be a fallback position developing, i.e.,
The important issue is whether the invasion of Iraq was justified post-9/11 (just a policy difference about how to deal with terrorism) not whether Bushco was grossly negligent pre-9/11. God, who is this idiot from the WH? Grahm up next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linda d Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. white house dude
who was that little pipsqueak? he was pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Wilkinson?
Looked completely desperate with his hair and manuscript blowing about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. What's in that RED FOLDER
saw him in a couple of interviews today and he had that red folder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. It had something to do with the publishing dates of certain books
He was trying to accuse Clarke of positioning the release of his book with his 9/11 testimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. "But What About The Timing?" is one of their lamest talking points
They say it with such high drama - trying to divert people to the "timing" of publication of the book since they really can't argue against Clarke's content. Thanks for picking up on the 3 month White House delay. . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Jim Wilkenson is a blabbering apologist
Jeeeeeeez this guy is all over the media blabbering 100 mph trying to overtalk hosts and DISMISS Clarkes book. The guy doesn't even realize(or he's trying to outtalk the forthcoming info) that the answers to his suppositions are already out there. For example: The book wasn't published before now because it wasn't allowed to be. It is PURE DESPERATION for the neocons.

Bubye Georgie porgie :hi:

(this guy was on hardball just now)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. I'll catch this on the replay, but he sounds like
the guy I saw on Faux with Neil Cavuto. Poor Neil kept trying to get the guy to defend Shrub, but he just failed repeatedly at the most softball of questions, and you could hear the pain in Cavuto's voice. I think they have a real, hard problem here.

Heh heh.

:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unknown Known Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. Bob Graham just unloaded another scud missile on CondiLiars head
Just said that Condi didn't know anything about the al Qaeda group when she came into her job. Said she was school in the Soviet Union of the Cold War years and the entire *WH acted like nothing had happened since Poppy was in office - like they were frozen in time. Well, that explains Cheney & Rumsferatu!

BTW, Graham also stated that Clarke is a registered repuke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I caught the tail end of Graham. Yes, Clarke is a republican so
"they" can't say this is a liberal smear. LOL What a bunch of dumbshi*s bushcos are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. why do you tune in to that whore?
He is the worst of the bunch - turn him off, and let his ridiculous propaganda hour die
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wabeewoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Usually I hate to watch him
but tonight he did ok. Or maybe the facts are just so in your face there is no denying them. The WH spokesman was pathetic and Graham was excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 20th 2024, 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC