Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Bush is Reelected, How long till World War III begins?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:18 AM
Original message
If Bush is Reelected, How long till World War III begins?
I'd like to say that this post is tongue in cheek, but I'm dead serious. The prospect of Bush winning a second term is one of the most dangerous possibilities this country has ever faced.

If Bush wins a second term, he will be uninhibited by the thought of reelection, and will then have nothing to restrain him from going forward, full throttle, with the Neocon/PNAC agenda.

Should this unimaginable event take place, you can almost take it to the bank that the US will instigate wars with Iran, Syria, and North Korea.

And since the military is already overstretched and overburdened, you can count on a reinstatement of the draft to supply the manpower for the PNAC agenda of global hegemony.

For myself, I say that Bush will plunge us into a third world war within three years of being reelected.

Never in my life have I felt such a sense of urgency to see someone defeated in a Presidential election as I do with Bush in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
prodigal_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sweetie
It's already started. Iraq was his Poland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Or maybe it was Afghanistan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overkil Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. One theory that I've heard.......
is that the cold war was WWIII and that we're now in WW4. This comes from my father who was 26yrs Navy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I've heard that myself
And I guess that it makes sense from a certain point of view, since most of the wars of the second half of the twentieth century were proxies for the global power struggle between the USA and USSR.

It wasn't really a world war in the same sense as the others though. When I say WWIII, I'm thinking along the lines of WWI & II.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supormom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. I believe you mean "reselected"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Probably 2 years.
They'll need to train draftees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drumwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. draft?
I can't imagine that a draft would go over real well with a large chunk of the U.S. general population. It was easy for chickenhawks to support the war in Iraq when they knew their asses wouldn't be taking bullets from snipers and insurgents. If they brought back the draft, I think you'd see the pro-war enthusiasm take a dive real quick.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. True, but
If he gets a second term, he's basically accountable to no one for four years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drumwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Bush may not be accountable.....
...but the Senators and Congressfolk will be. I would hope that they would not give him a free hand to do things that would be unpopular with most of the American popualtion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. The plan for a draft is already in committee. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. He was never legally elected in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. The question should be:
After Bush and his evil hordes are kicked out of office, and the stench is removed from the Oval Office (where is Martha Stewart when you need her) . . . how long will it be before WWIII thing ends.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. WWIII has already begun - This is the PNAC plan.
Edited on Mon Mar-29-04 02:19 AM by bumbler
They like to call it WW4, in order to suggest that it is analogous to the cold war, and imply that the (US/white) casualty rate will be at "acceptable" levels (millions of dead and millions of maimed foreigners don't seem to count for much in their calculations).

The question is not when it begins, but if it will end before the US is completely destroyed. If the PNAC-fundie-corporatist-fascist cabal continues in power after 2004 the word Armageddon will no longer be commonly understood as some thing that just happens "over there."

(Edit: near miss on keyboard)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
14. hmmm - I think prodigal_green was right on the money there
.
.
.

Afghanistan was "justified" - we knew Al-Quaeda was there.

Iraq was a combination of three things in my mind.

One: The USA wanted to see if the world would let them get away with it, and they did.

Two: Major target practice and testing of all the USA's targeting weapons, as well as testing the Military's ability at suburban warfare. Sorta failing in the suburban warfare thing, but their missiles and bombs sorta performed "admirably" from the BFEE's point of view.

Three: Mass American troops, planes, subs and carriers in the European arena. Who knows how many armed subs lie beneath those waters?

It almost appears as if the USA is aggravating everyone possible, Iran, North Korea, China, etc. The USA's new "pact" with Pakistan is disturbing, another "ally" that is conveniently close to the Middle East, Russia and China.

The USA is pressuring Canada to install THEIR missiles in OUR country for "protection". I don't buy it. It's a quick lob over the pole to Russia and China methinks.

As to "when" - I'll be surprised if all hell doesn't break loose just BEFORE the election. People in the USA would be awful uncomfortable to change the Commander in Chief in an all out war.

Just my Canuk thoughts . . . .

(sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. * = All warfare, all the time...
But it could get far more complicated, which is why we have to send those bastards packing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 16th 2024, 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC