I'm a Clark fan, and I'd love to see him run so that Dems can really begin a dialogue on the national security issue, but honestly, I think he'd do better as a cabinet member.
Gen. Clark is popular among most of us, and if he chooses not to run, then ideally I'd like to see him attach himself to the frontrunner early next year, much in the way Colin Powell attached himself to Chimp, lending credibility in the world affairs arena.
By the way, here's an interesting recent tidbit about Gen. Clark from Correspondences.org:
http://www.correspondences.org/archives/000227.htmlThe good news is that no one in the US national security community takes General Wesley Clark seriously--he is cabinet material, if Dean gets desperate for a general (former Marine Commandant Al Gray, or former CINCENT Tony Zinni would be cooler), but he is not Presidential material. Our sources tells us that if he runs for President there will be a number of quite inflammatory and specific leaks from British general officers that were outraged with his poor judgement and other performance deficiencies on the NATO front. Personally we think that General Clark was quite skilled at NATO politics; that he was undermined by US Pentagon flag colleagues, and that he has a great deal to offer--but he is not a giant-killer.- Jennifer, hoping Wesley involves himself in any capacity except Veep! :-)