Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's Defeat Arnold Because He's Incompetent Not Because He's Evil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-03 11:03 AM
Original message
Let's Defeat Arnold Because He's Incompetent Not Because He's Evil
Edited on Fri Aug-08-03 11:29 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
So he smoked pot


Big deal. Who hasn't


So he put the wood to alot of Hollywood starlets or would be starlets who weren't his wife.

So did Ronald Reagan when he was married to Jane Wyman.

So his father was a Nazi.

Unless it's proven that facism is genetically transferred he gets a pass.

I have seen him for several years. He's Bill Weld with muscles and without the intellect;fiscally conservative and socially liberal but his grasp on the issues is weak.

Let's be bigger than our opponents. Let's defeat Arnold because he's incompetent not because he's evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-03 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. "So he smoked pot"
Well that is illegal. And as a gubernatorial candidate in California I think it relates to his stance on legalization of marijuana whatever that may be. If he is against legalization, then it is necessary and valid to show photos of him toking.

The bigger opponent is the one that wins, and taking the high road in California will not get anyone into the governor's mansion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-03 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I Smoked Pot
Edited on Fri Aug-08-03 11:33 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
Pounds of it when I was a teenager and I oppose legalization.

However I do support decriminaliztion of all drugs with an emphasis on treatment.

Also, I don't think CA voters care if Arnold smoked a joint twenty five years ago.

We are on the verge of making ourselves worse than irrelevant. We will make ourselves into laughingstocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-03 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. If you broke a law in your adult life
and run for public office, it is valid to bring it up publicly. However, that would probably get him votes in California.

I think smear campaigns are fine as long as they are accurate proven facts and geared to a particular areas voters. There never was a high road in politics. That is just a nostalgic longing for Shangrala.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-03 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. You're playing right into the GOP's hands
Edited on Fri Aug-08-03 11:13 AM by slackmaster
Democrats should focus on Question 1: Recall or Do Not Recall? Is Davis a hopeless fuckup or just a decent governor put into an impossible situation by factors beyond his control, i.e. the economy, Enron, etc.?

If you make it into a beauty pageant then Arnold Schwarzenegger will prevail. The GOP strategy is to divide Democrats up into as many camps as possible, and they're doing it. The Democratic Party made a HUGE strategic blunder by not getting behind ONE alternative Democratic candidate to become governor in the event Davis is recalled. Instead we now have at least three non-GOP entries who each have enough popular support to prevent any of the others from achieving a plurality, thus handing it to the GOP.

If the recall succeeds the best hope to prevent a GOP takeover now is for Republicans to split among the relatively liberal Governator, conservative Tom McClintock, and whoever else enters the fray. Face it guys, Democratic leadership blew it BIG TIME. And Davis and his supporters filing their failed lawsuits looks really bad. Davis is sworn to uphold the state Constitution and existing statutes, not what he thinks it should say. Having his own Attorney General file a brief against him was pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Giverney Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-03 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Govenor of Cali
I'm not in Cali, i'm in Texas (which sucks, I hate all the SUVs and big trucks).. but from what i've read, only 25% of californian's support Davis.. that's BAD .. real bad. He's not doing something right, that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-03 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yea
Edited on Fri Aug-08-03 11:25 AM by quinnox
And I admire him for coming here with nothing, and then fulfilling the American dream. The father a Nazi thing is laughable. Sometimes I suspect too many people have been watching too many Star Trek episodes, thinking that the Klingon blood stain of shame goes to the sons and for many generations. It's silly.

His movies I have to say I have enjoyed a few of them, especially Terminator and Commando. There is no question to me he is entertaining.

What is in question is his ability to govern a state like California, why anyone would vote for a movie actor with no qualifications is a puzzle. I don't think he will win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-03 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thank you for commenting on the "father a Nazi" thing
That non-issue is sure to backfire on anyone who tries to exploit it against Schwarzenegger.

BTW the one good thing I've learned from this episode is how to spell Schwarzenegger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-03 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I Liked Twins
The premise that Arnold and Danny Devito were twins was hilarious.

Hell, just seeing Danny Devito makes you chuckle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-03 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. That will play well with Democrats, but not with Republicans
All but the most zelot Republicans will be appalled at Arnold's adulterist and lechorous past. Also, religious Republicans don't like him because on every social issue he's a liberal, a far-left liberal.

The robber baron Republicans and the Republican party hacks like him because he'll campaign for Bush (do you really want an untarnished Terminator campaigning for Bush all throughout 2004?) using his bully pulpit of the CA governor office. Also, Republicans already have a Constitutional amendment ready to allow foreigners, like Arnold, to become President.


Arnold the Barbarian
By John Connolly in Premier Magazine
March 2001

Once, he was a box office terminator. But now that Arnold Schwarzenegger has lost some of his muscle in Hollywood, stories of his boorish behavior can no longer be routinely erased. Then again, he'd make a helluva politician. The tabloid press got a nice Christmas present late last year when Arnold Schwarzenegger tore through a day of publicity work in London, promoting his latest film, The 6th Day, which had just opened there. In less than 24 hours, the star was said to have attempted to, as high school boys used to say, cop a little feel from three different female talk-show hosts. The level of consternation expressed by those who received this hands-on treatment from the hulking, Austrian-born international superstar ranged from none whatsoever (Denise Van Outen of The Big Breakfast invites her guests to lie on a bed with her and, hence, probably has a rather elastic definition of what constitutes inappropriate behavior) to irked (on tape, Celebrity interviewer Melanie Sykes looks a little thrown off after Arnold gives her a very definite squeeze on the rib cage, directly under her right breast) to, finally, righteously indignant. Anna Richardson of Big Screen claims that after the cameras stopped rolling for her interview segment, Schwarzenegger, apparently attempting to ascertain whether Richardson’s breasts were real, tweaked her nipple and then laughed at her objections. “I left the room quite shaken,” she says. “What was more upsetting was that his people rushed to protect him and scapegoated me, and not one person came to apologize afterward.”
...
http://www.health-and-medical.com/health/man_health_magazine/man_health_magazine_msg42682/man_health_magazine_msg42682.shtml
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=108&topic_id=15052&mesg_id=15052
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-03 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. He's a pawn
He should be defeated because he won't stand up to the energy companies like Davis has. He won't take on big oil or the auto manufacturers or the feds like Davis has. He won't stand up for farm workers like Davis has.

And there will be no chance that he'd work for temporary, emergency tax increases the spare services like Davis has.

BUT, defeating Arnie is a defeat for Bush and I'm torn on restrictions. CA has 54 electoral votes. Maybe it's time for 'anything goes'

At any rate, character and his regard for women are elements of public life and any hypocritical 'family values' swill opens the gate, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC