Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How much will the Iraq photos hurt Bush?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:26 PM
Original message
Poll question: How much will the Iraq photos hurt Bush?
Vote on a scale of 1-10, where 10 is maximum, 1 minimum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess I should have asked among whom. For decent, thinking
people he is already at the pinnacle of dislike. For freepers and repugs NOTHING will make them change their opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. The people that support him now will not care one bit.
Anyone stupid enough not to know what's going on would think the damn towelheads deserve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. The typical Bush voter...
Edited on Sat May-01-04 12:34 PM by Davis_X_Machina
...isn't convinced of the humanity of the poor black lady on the other side of town, never mind some soul-less (The President told them these people have no souls) heathen halfway around the world.

Little to no damage. Swing voters worship 'toughness' anyways. Comes from watching too much television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. My thoughts as well.
No impact at all upon those who would vote for the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is the poll that the media should take
Do the pictures of Iraqi prisoners being tortured bother you? (according to one poll, about 36% say no)

For those who say 'No', who will you vote for in 2004? (my guess, about 95% will say Bush)

I would love to see Wolfman spin that one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think it's a wash
People who love the Chimp will not hold the Jaysus-luvin' Christian responsible for the reprehensible acts of a few soldiers. Those who are unhappy with the war and who dislike Bush will probably see it as a symptom of the disaster of invading Iraq - another indignity heaped upon the people of an occupied country.

As an aside, I love your posts and your outrage. When I see one of your lengthy posts about the state of our nation it gives me the kick in the ass I sometimes need to stay pissed off and talking to the apathetic. It sometimes gets me in trouble and also lectues about how I've become obsessed, but it must be done by all of us. Thanks for your unceasing commitment - you're a treasure at DU. I don't know if you hear that enough...

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothmog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hurts a great deal
This takes away the claim that we rescued the Iraqis from torture and oppression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Any effect will be indirect
I don't think many people will blame Bush directly. But more of them will turn against the war and the occupation, and that will have an impact on Bush's support in the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. 7 because 3 in ten will support the cruelty depicted as...
necessary and needed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's too far removed.
Can't be responsible for every grunt, ya know.
And I guess no one will say IF WE HADN'T INVADED THE FREAKIN' COUNTRY IN THE FIRST PLACE NONE OF THIS COULD HAVE HAPPENED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. I doubt Dubya will be affected at all
It's the poor sods in the line of fire who'll pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadeJarl Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not enough!
It will only be the soldiers who take a beating, none of their superiors who, without a doubt, would have known/encouraged the issue.

GWB will get off without a scratch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bush is going down for this.
Bush is going down for this. But I'm afraid, not before he takes us all down with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. This isn't unusual
This is what Americans do, they kill and humiliate anyone lesser than themselves, look around, it's everywhere on some level. It's accepted. Oh."the outrage". Bullshit, people in the flyover states and the redneck south probably laughed until they cried. Bush probably did too off camera. He laughed when he killed Cala Faye Tucker. HE has no soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gemini Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Hmm...
As someone who lives in the "flyover" states and as someone who talks to others who live in the "flyover" states, I think you're wrong.
The people I've talked to are as outraged about this as anyone on either coast.
I suspect in the "redneck" south, I'd find the same outrage.

Other than that, I'm sure bush found it to be very amusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. As Bush is talking about "bringing freedom and
Democracy to Iraq", people will be thinking about the latest photos of our troops torturing Iraqis.

It kinda torpedoes his rhetoric, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. I answered 1 not at all. I listened to Washington Journal today
ALL the Repugs said it was no big deal and this stuff happens in war. ALL the Dems said it was another Vietnam and America should be ashamed.

This won't hurt Shrub at all. It might however, help Kerry. It validates the accusations he made 30+ years ago of the strocities in Vietnam and the reason he tossed his medals. Perhaps those too young to remember will now understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't think it will hurt him much
It's like he is the REAL Teflon president. Also, I think a lot of Bushies and Americans don't really care about what happens to Iraqis.

It's ironic too, now that I think of it. BushCo's only rational left is that we went in there for humanitarian reasons. Some humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. none at all
he isn't directly involved in this. They'll just write it off as a few misbehaving soldiers that he had no control over.

Although for once I won't blame him completely, while he is responsible since the troops shouldn't have been there in the first place, there was cases of rape of civilian women in Bosnia by American soldiers, was Clinton to blame for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC