Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember when Alan Dershowitz condoned torture in the war on terra?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:05 PM
Original message
Remember when Alan Dershowitz condoned torture in the war on terra?
Edited on Sat May-01-04 08:14 PM by saywhat
He and other naive, deluded prominent individuals have helped unleash the fascist dogs of war. How anybody could have trusted the * administration after selection 2000 is beyond my comprehension. Obviously Dershowitz thought that post 9/11 ANYTHING GOES! Truly despicable coming from a distinguished Harvard law professor, who wrote a scathing book documenting SCOTUS Bush v. Gore treasonous ruling. I wonder if he's ashamed. If he's not he should be.
:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

Edited to provide a link by popular request :D

LINK:

http://search.netscape.com/ns/boomframe.jsp?query=alan+dershowitz+torture&page=1&offset=0&result_url=redir%3Fsrc%3Dwebsearch%26requestId%3D8793358d32e538a7%26clickedItemRank%3D1%26userQuery%3Dalan%2Bdershowitz%2Btorture%26clickedItemURN%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.cnn.com%252F2003%252FLAW%252F03%252F03%252Fcnna.Dershowitz%252F%26invocationType%3D-%26fromPage%3DNSCPIndex2%26amp%3BampTest%3D1&remove_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2003%2FLAW%2F03%2F03%2Fcnna.Dershowitz%2F
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. You do realize some here have no frame of reference for what the hell
exactly you're talking about. Please take the time to inform those of us who may have missed what Mr. Dershowitz has said (recently?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Done.
I thought most knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. after 9-11 there was a big debate about making evidence from torture legal
Edited on Sat May-01-04 08:19 PM by bobbieinok
There were some WP articles (sometimes with named sources) of debate within FBI, CIA, police, lawyers.

There was discussion of the possibility of sending prisoners to countries 'with a better tradition' of torture.

Dershowitz supported this; I found this very shocking.

The whole debate was in the context of the MAJOR changes to US laws under the Patriot Act, W's executive order authorizing secret arrests/trials/executions/no appeal, and Ashcroft's order authorizing recording of prisoner-lawyer conversations.

There were MAJOR CHANGES MADE IN THE US LEGAL SYSTEM with no citizen input.

(edit for spelling)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Remember when Alan Dershowits condoned torture in the war on terra?"
It's true...

My first time here...but I recall that saywhat...will have to do a search for a link!
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Oh, and welcome to DU medeakae!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahMira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Welcome, Medeakae!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. In fairness to Dershowitz
In fairness to Dershowitz, what he was talking about in his book had nothing to do with this kind of thing. I strongly disagree with Dershowitz on this matter (see link below), but we should recognize that he was advocating limited use of non-lethal torture for the specific purpose of preventing a horrendous crime.

What happened in Abu Ghraib was nothing like that. That was torture for the pleasure of the torturers. It was pure humiliation and simply pointless.

Why Torture Doesn't Work: A Critique of Alan Dershowitz' Case for Torture
by Jack Rabbit (Democratic Underground, March 11)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Yes, I think it is exactly what he was advocating.
Edited on Sat May-01-04 08:28 PM by w4rma
But, now, it's even more plainly obvious that this crap doesn't fly.

I'll bet it seemed much different in theory than it looks (for all the world to see) in practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It isn't go to fly now, that's for sure
Again, I think it is unfair to lay Abu Ghraib at Dershowitz' feet; even though I don't agree with what he has to say about torture, no one should assume he would condone what was happening in Abu Ghraib on the basis of his thesis in his book, Why Terrorism Works. In fact, I think he would join us in condemning what happened there.

Nevertheless, this is why we don't allow torture and why Dershowitz' thesis is so abominable. This kind of thing can't be finessed. It's just wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahMira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Whoa!
Edited on Sat May-01-04 08:28 PM by LeahMira
How anybody could have trusted the * administration after selection 2000 is beyond my comprehension. Obviously Dershowitz thought that post 9/11 ANYTHING GOES!

This sort of thing goes on in wartime, or any time men and women are holding power over "the other." It's not unique to the present administration other than that the administration made it possible for men and women to be in that situation.

Alan Dershowitz says a lot more than his prayers, and not all of it worth much, IMO. What happened to the Iraqis is totally wrong... but it happens. It happens in wartime, it happens in our prisons, and good grief... didn't you ever read Lord of the Flies?

My hope is that the people involved are punished with more than a slap on the wrist. I hope they are made to serve those they tormented in some way to attempt restitution somehow, although I don't know exactly how they could. I hope as well that the military takes whatever measures are necessary to make sure that personnel are aware of the wrongness of these kinds of actions and will think twice if they are ever tempted to do something similar. I also hope that there is better supervision, so that someone will stop it before it starts.

At the same time, my prayer is that I will never be in a situation like the one they were in. I'd like to believe that I would never do anything similar, but I know that given all the wrong circumstances I might. Let's indeed be outraged, but let's also do what we can to see to it that wars don't happen in the future. War causes this sort of thing... not Bush, not Dershowitz, but wars.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. you are right
yes i remember. i knew people were talking about how they could go beyond in their torture to get information now with 9/11 events. and he was one. thank you for this reminder. i think it is time to get him back on the camera and ask if this is what he was endorsing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't trust Dershie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. awe shucks
thanks you guys....have been reading for awhile and send your posts to dem publicist and senator's aides....

You're all way too cool and so on top of it...best site on the web!
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. If you read the article you posted, Dershowitz explicitly rules out the
Edited on Sat May-01-04 09:04 PM by Bombtrack
kind of thing that went on in those photos from being anything close to exceptable.

I don't know where you get off blaming him for something he specifically said should never happen.

""My basic point, though, is we should never under any circumstances allow low-level people to administer torture. If torture is going to be administered as a last resort in the ticking-bomb case, to save enormous numbers of lives, it ought to be done openly, with accountability, with approval by the president of the United States or by a Supreme Court justice. I don't think we're in that situation in this case.

BLITZER: Well, how do you know ...

DERSHOWITZ: So we might be close.

BLITZER: Alan, how do you know he doesn't have that kind of ticking-bomb information right now, that there's some plot against New York or Washington that he was involved in and there's a time sensitivity? If you knew that, if you suspected that, you would say get the president to authorize torture.""

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. but ... Iraq is not part of the war on terror
and I'm surprised anyone here would make the connection.

The entire Iraq "war" was a crime from the get-go. And it continues to be. And it is finally being revealed as exactly that, in unexpected ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbillhaywood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. Dershowitz supports civil liberties except when it comes to dirty
Arabs and filthy Muslims. He actually has a long history of this. Back when he was known as a staunch supporter of free speech and civil rights, he argued that Palestinian rights groups should not have the right to public speech or demonstration because they are "anti-Semetic". Dershowitz has always been an Arab/Muslim-hating racist bum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC