The abuse was Clinton's and feminist fault

http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=6522

Please don't flame me for posting this from the spectator. Just looking to see what we are up against. How many people in this country actually think like this?

It did not take long for the RW to blame Clenis and the evil feminist. I posted a little bit from the article, about as much as I could stomach, but there is tons more deception and facism to be mined in this article. Posted a link so that you all could get a laugh, but in reality, reading this pis##d me off.


"The feminist cultural assumption justifying women in combat is that violence against women in war and violence done by women during warfare are costs society must accept in order for "equality" to advance. Conservatives were shouted down when they warned that placing women in combat would not only expose them to abuse but could turn them into abusers"

"Speaking to TAS, she asked a question no mainstream newspaper will bother to ask: "Why were women assigned to watch the male prisoners?" The answer lies in the "interchangeability idea" the Clinton military hammered home, she says. The idea was "sexuality doesn't matter,"

where do they get the balls to print this kind of crap

and they talk about the liberals spinning stuff--this is the ultimate spin on this story

It just floored me. What is even more shocking is that there are people that will actually believe this shit, then it will show up in the RW megaphone. By this afternoon, Rush, Hannity, Man-Cow, Fox and Friends will be parroting this line and we'll get an exclusive from CNN on how this is all the fault of Clinton's military.

How naive and gullible (sp) can people get. I swear to God, Jesus himself could come down and smack * in the face, and they would say Jesus was a "liberal media elite who only wanted to harm the pResidents election chances". If this line of bullcrap is swallowed, then I think we are in a world of trouble. The america I knew died when the Fairness Doctrine died.

I read four paragraphs and now feel my blood pressure rising. I just can't even read such tripe.

But I think it is important to see the kind of crap that gets passed around RW neo-cons as news. If we truly had a free press, they would smack down piece of s$#T rags like this on a daily basis.

This is serious stuff. This is the same thing that turned Al Gore into a "chornic, serial liar", it's the same stuff that turned Howard Dean into "unstable", and it is the same stuff that is turning a highly decorated Vietnam Vet into a "flip-flopping, commy pinko, French looking weakling."

Tell me this...If we truly had a free press, would the neo-con chickenhawk, I never saw a deferment I didn't like people be able to label JFK as soft on defense?

the level of 'spin' that's happened over the past 2 years..it's mindboggling..in fact it's a form of complete insanity

How the Repukes can get away without having to claim AM Radio as a "campaign contribution in kind" is beyond me.

Someone should make these folks claim that 168 hours a week as a campaign contribution.

Jeeesus- these fuckers have some kind of serious mental illness to keep blaming CLinton for everything.

responsible for all the evil in the world.

I'm not kidding.

But only to thinking people, Democrats and Republicans (but most Republicans are in the closet with their opinions). Right-wing sheeple--ooops, that's redundant--let me start over.

RWers take whatever the party line is, right, wrong, indifferent. They shift blame, twist the argument, and in general refuse to accept responsibility for ANYTHING that doesn't help their agenda.

Lay-down Americans who put up with this get what they deserve.

The blame lies with that stupid female soldier. RWers all know it, but want to use the opportunity to bitch about feminism, Clinton's penis, FDR, Kennedy, whatever. Ho-freaking-hum. Let them get a new tack. They bore me.

"this is a clear example of the problem with the don't ask don't tell policy."

From another freeper source.

Get your outrages straight, freeps!