Flag Waver or Flag Burner ?

some one brought this up in different thread

I honor the American flag with all the courtesies and protocols defined ... including destroying a tattered, worn, or stained flag by burning it, as defined by US Code. (I personally bury the ashes in the soil of the country.)

When the 'leadership' puts a stain on that flag, it deserves burning. The ONLY people who can bring dishonor to what that flag represents are the elected representatives of the people by acting obscenely contrary to our national honor and principles.

I never fly a flag that's tattered and soiled (like on a car antenna) and never fly it at night unless a light is shone upon it.

I love this country. Just hate the current leadership.

I do however love people and have compassion when they are hurt. This administration hurts people. Here and abroad.

in the USA, eh? I'm Canadian, and this whole "Flag worship" is so completely foreign to our culture.

Of course, we've only HAD our flag since 1965, so take my comment with a grain of salt.

burning it is allowing the RW to coopt it

that there's a real frog in there?

Neither.

Although I agree that people have the right to burn the flag, that's my flag too. I'm not gonna let some rw bastard co-opt my country from me. Personally, however, I like the "Don't Tread on Me" flag more.

it belongs to all of us, it's our heritage, both the good and the bad...

It supplies much needed elbow room.

The flag is a symbol. Waving a flag is symbolic. Burning a flag is symbolic. They are on opposite ends of the spectrum, and yet, they coexist, one as a symbol of pride and one as a symbol of opposition.

It depends upon the individual. Personally, I am neither.

although I never have and probably won't. I doubt I'll ever own one myself, unless I fly it alongside a peace flag and a flag of the world, or dare I say it-underneath a flag of the world and side by side with a peace flag. Personally, i find it silly to identify with a country. I am a human being first and only. I just happened to be born into this country. That being said, I'm feeling more inclined to burn lately, although in my more youthful days of indoctrination I would have answered "flag waiver".

Why identify with a flag at all? Isn't all identification and nationalism rooted in our past, those things we've been taught to be proud of? OUr present situation is a direct result of our bloody, greedy past. If you agree, where do you draw the line as to what you embrace? Do you forget the atrocities against the native peoples of N. America and embrace only our best achievements, etc? or vice-versa? All are reality. Silly?

but a human.

it's my flag and it's my country.

The two options are you either love the US or hate the US. There is a third option being you're indifferent about the US, which probably describes me. I mean on one side of a big river, the river is called the Rio Grande and that side of the river is the USA. On the other side of the river, the river is called the Rio Bravo, and the land on that side of the river is called Mexico. There are no signs from the heavens showing that this river is any more important than any other river, it's just an idea, a concept, that this river is supposed to have some kind of effect on humans relations with one another. I don't think it should, so I suppose I am more of the internationalist concept than the nationalist concept. I do think local communities should be autonomous, something the people who run the USA nation apparently do not agree with.

I would not burn the American flag alone as it would say it would mean I have something against this idea of a nation and not the other ones. If one day the working people of the world all agreed to live in peace, and threw all of their flags on a big bonfire, on that day I would probably be happy to see the US flag burn. I don't find the US flag any more offensive than any other national flag though. Hell, the red stripes that represent the conquest of Ireland in the British flag offends me. Perhaps a Native American would look at the flag's 13 stripes and 50 stars, and see the stars as symbols of conquest as well. Which, considering the lack of respect for Indian treaties to this day, continues to this day.

If you really want to make a political statement, don't burn the flag, wash it.


:kick:

. I'm worried about the war. I don't understand why some leftist think it's more important to insult flag lovers than stop the war.

that on DU there are flag wavers and flag burners and both are ok
as for the leftists you are talking about they are critquing nationalism which some of us see as the cause of war.Some believe it is stupid to worship a flag and some see stupidity in the idea of dividng up the globe into countries

being dangerous though. Imagine Bush controlled the whole globe. Additionally the flag is a symbol and I don't expect them to disappear so long as there are humans. It is about language itself. Flag burners create more heat than light because they look like they are opposed to all American values including good ones. It is inarticulate protest as far as I am concerned.

some dont believe in gov some believe in communuity gov but see people as people Also see Emma Goldmans Patriotism a menace to liberty
http://www.spunk.org/library/writers/goldman/sp000064.html

Next silly question - Do you prefer cats or dogs?

WHO SEZ YOU HAVE TO CHOOSE?

I hope I never have to burn a flag. That would be very bad.

I've been posting this a lot lately but here it comes again:

Deeply indoctrinated blind emotional response to symbols is the most important tool in promoting fascism, something the US government excels at. Nationalism has the same murderous effect as racism. It defines 'others' as sanctioned targets for violence in the name of primal 'family values.'

I have studied the history, psychology, linguistics, and tactics of fascism in depth over the last few years. I've learned that nationalist identity is the single most important tool of fascism.

Group think is needed to prevent independent thought and action apart from the herd. Conformity and obedience when enemies are defined for you leads to dehumanization and atrocities such as My Lai and Abu Ghraib.

So I've put together some links to examine this destructive social phenomenon that I can't resist sharing with anyone who will listen since I judge it to be a rising tide that many won't notice until they are choking on it and wondering where the liberty they used to breathe went and what is that awful smell?

A famous British psychologist did an analysis of Bush*'s family history and personality. Little Georgie was abused, belittled, and overshadowed by his parents so he became an alcoholic, self-destructive, anti-intellectual, and cruel 'authoritarian personality.' His rebellion against his parents is killing many innocents.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1033904,00.html
(So George, How Do You Feel About Your Mom and Dad?

This 'authoritarian' personality is the precursor to Fascism Receptivity as defined by researchers in 1950 who tried to understand how large populations could embrace dictators like Franco, Mussolini, and Hitler. Many Americans match the profile, especially religious fundamentalists. Surprised? I didn't think so. But no comparisons with Hitler, OK? 'Chosen Few' doesn't mean 'Master Race'...does it?
http://www.anesi.com/fscale.htm
(The F Scale Questionnaire to Determine Fascist Receptivity)

Another indictment of cruelty comes from this study on the components of conservatism studied in an academic model. It confirms differences we have noticed as liberals: fear of change, acceptance of inequality, black and white thinking, targeting of 'others.'
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/07/22_politics.shtml
(What Makes a Political Conservative)

Now, the 14 scary symptoms of Fascism as a social phenomenon to tie it all together even...worse.
http://empirewatch.org/pages/_archives/fascism/pages/14_symptoms.html
(The Fourteen Symptoms of Fascism)

And now, an analysis of a Bush* State of the Union speech that illustrates the linguistic science of abusive speech used to psychologically manipulate and deceive the listener, something White House speech writers have mastered to diminish the power of the listener. Yes, the counterrevolution has been televised.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/130534_focusecond13.html
(The Power of the Presidency Resides in Language as Well as Law)

This article explains the power of repetition as mind programming and the tactics of disinformation and segregation of 'conspiracy' ideas to hide knowledge of government manipulation through the use of television and other ubiquitous media. The 1938 radio broadcast of 'The War of the Worlds' confirmed the power of mass deception that has been exploited for decades.
New! Improved! Coming to a theater near you!
http://www.mackwhite.com/tv.html
(The TV Hive Mind)

Here is an article that explores the marketing power of fear used by Detroit to sell Americans SUVs, along with help from Arnold Schwarzenegger and the first Bush Gulf war. The same methods were used to link these previous sales to the gutting of the Bill of Rights and an unjustified pre-emptive war all at the same time. What a campaign!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,995252,00.html
Trading On Fear

"Thinking men and women the world over are beginning to realize that patriotism is too narrow and limited a conception to meet the necessities of our time. The centralization of power has brought into being an international feeling of solidarity among the oppressed nations of the world; a solidarity which represents a greater harmony of interests between the workingman of America and his brothers abroad than between the American miner and his exploiting compatriot; a solidarity which fears not foreign invasion, because it is bringing all the workers to the point when they will say to their masters, "Go and do your own killing. We have done it long enough for you."
>snip<
...it is probably even more important to carry the truth into the barracks than into the factory. When we have undermined the patriotic lie, we shall have cleared the path for that great structure wherein all nationalities shall be united into a universal brotherhood, a truly FREE SOCIETY."
----------------------------------
Unfortunately, the weaponization of space will allow the centralized powers to fight their own wars more and more just like Dr. frikkin' Evil.

http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/

Proposals here include global sensors coordinated with space lasers to create MITCH or Man In The CHair capability.

And they will frikkin' do it, too.

As a veteran and genuine patriot, I am disgusted and offended by the cavalier way in which the Flag is often treated of late. I saved a photo of Bunnypants signing a miniature flag, which is desecration and incredibly offensive. That arrogant piece of shit! I regularly see tattered, faded, and improperly displayed flags flown by those who haven't a freekin' clue as to the proper procedure or the true meaning of displaying this country's flag. At this point, I will not display the flag for fear of being mistaken for a false patriot.

I also believe the flag can be honored by burning it in protest. "The blood of patriots" and all that.

I am not a Nationalist and I do not worship the flag the way some do. On the other hand I have desire to burn a flag or to put down the country as whole, just our fascist government and its insane policies.

To best sum it up, I think it was a Texas State Representative that
said something to the affect, "I find myself more in sympathy with
those who would burn the flag tnd wrap themselves in the constitiution. Than those who would burn the constitution and
wrap themselves in the flag."