Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Inspector (David Kay) warned U.S. officials of Iraqi prisoner abuse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:13 AM
Original message
Inspector (David Kay) warned U.S. officials of Iraqi prisoner abuse
Inspector says he warned U.S. officials of Iraqi prisoner abuse

May 6, 2004

Inspector says he warned U.S. officials of Iraqi prisoner abuse

By BOB GIBSON
Media General News Service

CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. -- David Kay, the man who led the U.S. search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, says he repeatedly told people about problems with the interrogation of prisoners, but the military ignored him.

"I was there and I kept saying the interrogation process is broken. The prison process is broken. And no one wanted to deal with it," Kay said. "It was too, too distasteful. This is a known problem, and the military refuses to deal with it."

snip...

Anything less than severe action, which he described as a "hanging," against a two- or three-star general in charge means "in the Middle East, they are always going to believe we did it as part of a sanctioned process," Kay said.

"I am terribly worried that if we only charge the seven or 15 reservists who were involved and condemn the contractors who were involved and maybe the one-star reserve general who was in charge of this overall military prison unit, I think we will have done a horrible mistake," Kay said.

"Who's responsible for their behavior? Or are they scot-free?" Kay asked. He said that contract employees could be charged by a federal prosecutor with "violating a normative international law" but cannot be touched by the military that hired them because "the only sanction the military has against them is removal."

more at link...

http://www.morningnewsonline.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=FMN/MGArticle/FMN_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031775300094&path=!news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Josh Marshall cites Rumsfeld's "coarse, vulgar remarks" re prisoners
Edited on Fri May-07-04 06:23 AM by displacedtexan
Marshall offers no link, but I'm sure The Nelson Report can be googled.


(May 06, 2004 -- 08:05 PM EDT // link // print)

An interesting tidbit from this evening's edition of The (must-read) Nelson Report ...

We can contribute a second hand anecdote to newspaper stories on rising concern, last year, from Secretary of State Powell and Deputy Secretary Armitage about Administration attitudes and the risks they might entail: according to eye witnesses to debate at the highest levels of the Administration...the highest levels...whenever Powell or Armitage sought to question prisoner treatment issues, they were forced to endure what our source characterizes as "around the table, coarse, vulgar, frat-boy bully remarks about what these tough guys would do if THEY ever got their hands on prisoners...."

-- let's be clear: our source is not alleging "orders" from the White House. Our source is pointing out that, as we said in the Summary, a fish rots from its head. The atmosphere created by Rumsfeld's controversial decisions was apparently aided and abetted by his colleagues in their callous disregard for the implications of the then-developing situation, and by their ridicule of the only combat veterans at the top of this Administration.

Tough guys ...
-- Josh Marshall
www.talkingpointsmemo.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Does anyone remember a Bush speech
in which Bush said something like "let's put it this way, they won't be causing trouble any more," referring to terrorists -- maybe in Afghanistan?

I remember thinking at the time that he sounded like a vigilante, and that he was clearly implying that people would be killed (no messy trials?) and he was pretty cool to be saying that.

Sadly, my brain only retains the vague outline of this. Anyone know what I'm talking about, since I don't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Let the Iraqi courts try them then!
Edited on Fri May-07-04 06:25 AM by Hubert Flottz
If they were EVIL Doers!

Edit} The contractor problem is the biggie here that they are trying to hide! Tom DeLay is leading the charge to duck and cover!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You got that one right Herbert -
The civilian contractors isn't what this administration wants to be investigated. They don't want to talk about who they are, who they work for and who approved of using these methods?

Can anyone remember junior saying that we were going to find those WMD from some loose talking Iraqi? Rummy said it, Powell said it and hell knows who Else.

So let's talk about those civilian contractors and their connections with the CIA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Senator Warner: "Isolated incident"...
He is in denial or has not read MG Taguba's report. I just saw him on GMA and he has his mind made up before the rummy hearing that it is just and isolated incident of abuse and not systematic. Swell.... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Change of Evil heart means!
He and Tom DeLayanyinvestigation had a heart to heart chat with KKKarl and set up plan A "operation sweep under the rug"! Oh that's right, they could not have had a heart to heart chat, for obvious reasons!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC