Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld: It's not the Abuse, it's the PHOTOS of Abuse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 12:54 PM
Original message
Rumsfeld: It's not the Abuse, it's the PHOTOS of Abuse
Rumsfeld seems to be saying today, and the trascript will confirm later, that the PHOTOS of the abuse are what is damaging and not the abuse itself.

How f-ed up is that?

Anyone else watching/listening getting that impression too?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. well yes
and it was ILLEGAL!! too!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy331 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep! If it wasn't for those dam pictures.
Edited on Fri May-07-04 12:57 PM by candy331
He seemed to be very agitated saying who in the world knew they were running around snapping pictures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalcanuck Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. That's the same impression I had - he was more pissed that
the photos were taken and that they had been released to the general public. What a creep. I really think this is just the tip of the iceberg as many others on this board have already said. Thank heavens for DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Welcome to DU, jubug3!
Yes, Rummie strikes me as pretty smarmy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. another reason
to ban photographs. Truth is one thing, photos make an impression!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. another reason
to ban photographs. Truth is one thing, photos make an impression!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Photographs also steal people's souls
They are dangerous things indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Hey, that's right!. I guess that this only shows that ...
Rummy has had too many picture taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickster Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Other than the pictures being taken
the worst part is that the classified pictures were released to the media!(my impression from Rumsfeld)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, as if he would have given the pres more of an alarmist briefing
had he had those pictures. What ought a president to know?

More like, what might a president ASK???????Does it require Bush being spoon-fed????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've had that impression all along
I've also had the impression that the guards were told to get info about WMDs and Al Qaeda terrorists in Iraq any way they had to.

Rumsfeld is a first class moron if he doesn't realize that all combat soldiers take souvenirs, whether as benign as insgnia cut off a discarded enemy uniform or as foul as some of the stuff they took during Vietnam (don't ask, you don't want to know). It has always been this way in every war. That these guys took pictures and then shopped them around should come as no surprise.

Also no surprise is the fact that the pictures are causing much more Rumrage than the extreme humiliation of human beings does. After all, US citizens who are not wealthy are hardly human to the Bush gang; we can imagine they think far less of Iraqis.

All these bastards need to resign in disgrace. Their egos will prevent it, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes!
I heard that, too. Rummie basically reduced the problem to people with digital cameras and the media having access to the photos.

Maybe we need to amend the Patriot Act to make photography a crime unless it serves the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. In other words
He's not upset about the problem, he's upset they were caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. Damage Control
Plutocrats and autocrats ..
(1) Deny knowledge ("plausible deniability")
(2) Stifle exposure and rationalize it as "justice"
(3) Point downwards when speaking of "responsibility"
(4) Collect credits (and profits)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. As far as I heard him, he all but said that directly N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. damned evidence! I was looking so good if not for ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. Dead on, he still doesn't get it
Edited on Fri May-07-04 01:19 PM by teryang
He admits he didn't appreciate the impact of known cases of prisoner abuse in late January or early February when he communicated this to the President.

He was "blindsided" like everyone else by the firestorm created by the publication of the pictures. He claims his first knowledge of the pictures was when they appeared in the press. What did he think torture looked like?

This shows their real standards. It isn't the actual war crimes and Conventions violations, it's the pictures, it's the PR. He views it as a public relations problem, so does Myers, not a war crimes problem reflecting on policy, leadership, organization, morale, and the ultimate outcome of the war effort.

There's an old saying in the prosecution and defense business:

GET THE BAD NEWS OUT FIRST. Anything else impairs credibility. At this point Myers and Rumsfeld and the chimp have no credibility with the rest of the world.

Final point: Hiding behind concerns for DUE PROCESS for our soldier/scapegoats, when his actions and rules for GITMO and policies for detainees and captives in IRAQ, show no such concerns with repeated and continuing DUE PROCESS violations with respect to the processing and disposition of DETAINEES under the Geneva Conventions. Foreign countries, including England and Australia, and the Red Cross and other NGOs have been pointing out these continuing due process violations under the Conventions with little response from Rumsfeld or the Central Command. This larger policy issue is politely ignored by the Congress. Think it isn't connected. Rumsfeldt admitted the linkage between "lessons learned" at Gitmo and the tying of prisoner maintenance to interrogation in Iraq.

IT'S HIS POLICY-HE SHOULD BE FIRED.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. No, it's not the abuse -- it's ...
Edited on Fri May-07-04 01:40 PM by damnraddem
the torture. Rummy continues to claim that it's abuse, not torture. Then he gets off on the release of the info in the form of photos -- but don't buy into his abuse of the word 'abuse.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. It was illegal to classify these pictures...
...in an effort to cover up a crime...in this case war crimes. This is a misuse of the official secrets act...never meant to hide these types of things from scrutiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Classification Abuses are Rampant in this administration
The classifications and many other things have been abused by this administration.

Look at the Gitmo Bay treatment, now they are behind tall covered walls where nobody can get a picture of the inside.

Look at the Saudi Report on 9-11, not a bit about the country is declassified.

Look at the Energy Committee meetings, we have been forced to take it to the Supreme Court and now everyone is being quiet about it because of the newest distraction.

The list can go on and on and on, it's a common piece of news to hear that the Bush Administration has been the most secretive and the most abusive to our constitutional rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC