Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush political appointees in DOD undermined prisoner treatment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 07:37 AM
Original message
Bush political appointees in DOD undermined prisoner treatment
-snip-

The bar association's 110-page report, released last week, leaves no doubt that the practices revealed at Abu Ghraib violated both U.S. and international law. During the preparation of that report, Horton and his colleagues were more concerned with practices in Afghanistan and Guantánamo than in Iraq. What they have learned recently, however, suggests that questionable practices and attitudes toward prisoners stem from broad policy decisions made at the very highest levels of the Defense Department.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2004/05/07/rights/index.html

WTF?

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phaseolus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lemme guess --
the Federalist Society kinda likes the torture thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. And at the highest levels in the White House.
I have no doubt about that. Cheney was Sec of Defense under Bush1 and he was CERTAINLY part of this policy of abuse of the prisoners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's interesting.
Isn't that what McCain kept asking Rumsfeld and Rummie kept saying he didn't have the chain of command in front of him, adding he needed it because it seemed the thing had more than a few branches. Of course, we knew the thing led through the offices of the folks who bring you MK/ULTRA and who-knows-what-else. They're political appointees, all right -- the kind that never, ever leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick to the pants of the BFEE.
As "Commandeer-in-Thief," Bush is responsible. Oops. My bad. The buck stops with Cheney. After Rumsfeld, that is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gee, you mean Lynndie England didn't think of all of it by herself?
I'm shocked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC