Dopey Ads?
National anti-drug ad campaign might pique
teens’ interest in illicit drugs, researcher says
http://www.utexas.edu/features/*SNIP*
With the government spending about $195 million annually to purchase airtime for anti-drug ads and the Partnership for a Drug-Free America (PDFA)—a non-profit coalition of advertising, media and public relations professionals—securing more than $3 billion in donated media from broadcast, cable and radio networks since 1987, the anti-drug campaign is the largest and most expensive in history.
There’s a lot at stake. To validate the campaign messaging strategy and money being spent, a lot of research has been conducted to demonstrate the ads’ effectiveness. PDFA research findings show that anti-drug ads do connect with teens. The ads can be recalled and the knowledge they impart is recollected. And some studies even show a decrease in intention to use illicit drugs.
*SNIP*
However, Carson B Wagner, an assistant professor in the Department of Advertising at The University of Texas at Austin, contends that inadequate research measures are being used to evaluate the effectiveness of anti-drug ads and that more valid tests demonstrate that many anti-drug ads are having the wrong effects on teens, possibly increasing the likelihood for experimentation wit
*SNIP*
This approach led Wagner to uncover the curiosity-arousing effects of anti-drug advertising.
“Years ago, I noticed that every time a news story was broadcast about illicit drug use among teens, a small epidemic would ensue,” says Wagner. “Logic instructs us that news programs and anti-drug ads showing drugs in a negative light should not lead people toward drugs.”
*SNIP*