|
Not sure where this should be posted, so I put it in GD.
Okay, you-know-who published a hit/hate/enemy list with Michael Berg listed as an enemy.
Michael Berg was placed there because he protested Bush.
His son, Nicholas, was investigated for "an e-mail" that allegedly was sent by Zac. Muss------ (however you spell the name). Unlike many "enemy combatants" (in the current "war on terror") with nebulous ties to terrorist organizations, NB was released by the authorities.
NB eventually goes to Iraq, and gets detained by the Iraqi (US?) police/security. NB was a "guest" of said security forces for 13 days.
NB is released, and "allowed" to roam Iraq, despite being "suggested" to that he take the next flight home.
Now, the terrorists who murdered NB are probably unaware of the "enemies of Bush" list that was available. If so, it would be unlikely that they might have connected the name of NB with a "bush basher".
Why is this so? Well, you consider how many Iraqi nationals have been holed up in prison over there for whatever reason, and a good number of them (who knows the real percentage - there are enough being held for real reasons) are not tied to any terrorism. Despite what Rush will say, there are probably a good amount of people who were detained because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Wouldn't surprise me if some of them aided the US soldiers by pulling them out of a burning HumVee after a real terrorist bomb blew it up. Maybe because the detainee couldn't speak good English.
So, you have a guy detained by the occupying forces, then released without a scratch. Looks kinda suspicious to me. Maybe the terrorists might have figured that this guy was "connected" with the occupation. Who knows how they think.
Anyway, to my point.
A few years back, a man with a high-powered rifle found a list of abortion doctors off a website. He found a name on the list, and went to the doctor's home and assassinated him.
The website was placed under an injunction to cease and desist displaying the abortion doctors' names and home addresses. (I believe that it was later overturned).
Earlier this year, you-know-who published, along with Michael Berg, a list of people that are on their enemies list.
Does anybody have the list? Maybe we should notify these people (and the proper authorities in heavily blue areas) that their lives are quite possibly in danger from this group?
If anything untoward happens to these people, one of the clues should be the fact that their names (and locations?) were posted to a site which (although they will deny it) advocates harming anybody who speaks their true feelings about Bush.
If anybody has that list, I think that we need to get busy.
|