Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

voxfux and the Berg situation. This one is important because

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
homelandpunk Donating Member (787 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:10 AM
Original message
voxfux and the Berg situation. This one is important because
voxfux walks the walk.

http://www.voxfux.com /

<<BERG BEHEADING IS A BUSH "PSY OP"
Just in the nick of time, as the crusaders were going into meltdown over the outrage of the sexual perversions and torture photos of iraqi prisoners being released into the semiosphere, the word came down from up top, "We need a distraction, an atrocity, an outrage and we need it NOW!"
It's the classic "CIA, Black Op" it appears that The CIA arranged for some of their Iraqi musclemen (most likely Ahmed Chalabi) to cut off the head of what appears to be an American intelligence agent cutout for a staged atrocity, "made to order."
It looks like a "Sheep dip" operation. Berg is an Oswald. A patsy. A made to order, fall guy. A sleeper, waiting to be activated, this time as a sacrificial lamb to distract the comatose masses as they sit there and say, "Take my rights but protect my precious flesh."
Questions are swirling around the very suspicious activities of the CIA in the hours preceding the beheading of the 26 year old American.
There is also the question of the alarming, "coincidental," connection to Moussaoui.
The murdered man's father is coming out with a scathing attack on Bush claiming it's Bush who is behind the death of his kid.
And the message gets transmitted at different levels to different groups.
1) For the gullible non thinkers sheep they get the brunt of the horror and nothing more. For their brains are so profoundly stunted by the continous "Psy-op" and the alpha state induced conditioning from the television. In the alpha state you forget about the coffins and rape. And now you react exactly in the preplanned way and say, "See, Raping and torture is much better than Beheading, see, we're the good guys cause we only rape and torture, not like those evil terrorists who cut off people's heads... duh."
2) But to the thinking people, the people who are aware and awake the message is loud and clear: We can kill you at will. Anytime - anywhere. You'll be the next one in the orange smock.
3) Also the message to the antiwar movement (Berg was supposedly "Anti war") is: "Watch out! We're offing civilians now too." (Although don't believe for one second that he was just a civilian. He's got "Agency Patsy" written all over his decapitated body.)
4) Aparantly what the Freepers did was to get a list of anti war movement people and publicize it and create a hit list in essence and this kid's name was on the freepers list and he goes over there and get's picked up by US forces who later deny they detained him.
5) The Message is: Stuff happens to anti war people.
It's the softening up and desensitization of the human mind.
Gun's present in frame: Israeli Ak47 and a Mac 9MM
White plastic lawn chair identical is the same as in Abu Gharib prison torture and sexual assault photos.
Raising the threat level for those who can see it.
For those who can see what is real
prometheus (kid's company name)
The Neo Cons are bringing the terror to a new level.
They would of course have Chalabi's boys do the act.
It's got EVERY SINGLE HALLMARK OF A CIA BLACK OP JOB
1) It's got the bogus near certain identification of the hooded executioner as being "Al-Zarqawi" within minutes. A feat literally impossible for the CIA to do.
2) There was No Blood spurting from neck. Experts (Except the CIA "Ex-spurts") noticed the obvious lack of blood spurting from any neck artery which should accompany a beheading - There was none. (Major media fails to mention this obvious fact)
3) Looks like the same director who did the previous phony Bin Laden Video with the admittedly fake Bin Laden.
4) It's surfacing that Berg worked at the Abu Ghraib prison???????????????????WTF!!!
5) There is a Link to Moussaoui. Moussaoui emailed something from this kid's laptop. The FBI says: "Nothing to see here, move along." And the media doesn't dare talk too much about it. And they are going to try to tell the American people, "Oh it's just a coincidence that the so called 20th hijacker just COINCIDENTALLY emailed from this kid's laptop before 911. And the people who's minds have been so saddenly destroyed by the effects and dumbing down of the Television, will accept that it just must have been a coincidence. (The thinking is: If it's got the swirling graphics and ominous theme music and read by some blond bimbo on CNN, we can feed these mental midgets anything, no matter how rediculous - they'll believe anything.)
6) Berg has a mysterious Israeli passport stamp.
7) Berg has sensitive electronic equipment on his person that he has no paperwork for.
7) Berg travels the world helping the disadvantaged? Huh? What? Big Hmmmm on that one.
8) And just exactly what is a jew doing as a freelancer in the apocalyptic war torn Jew hating Iraq? Does he have a death wish? Is he mentally retarded? Nope, He's a US government agent - albiet a patsyesque one.
9) Bergs father smells a rat - he thinks it's the US Gov who killed his son - and not abstractly so either.
These are the working notes of this atrocity, look for updates as this story develops
Berg was absolutely positively murdered by the shadow operators of the US Government. It's in your face. It's a very dangerous time for the human race.
Get in their face
Dont have a shred of fear
Don't give in an inch to their Nazi tactics
Get off your knees
Open your mind
Wake up
and fight these bastards! - voxfux >>

A couple points I had not heard befroe: the guns present were
a Israeli Ak47 and a Mac 9MM.
And this observation: "It's got the bogus near certain identification of the hooded executioner as being "Al-Zarqawi" within minutes. A feat literally impossible for the CIA to do."
Exactly.
Wasn't the CIA being presented a mere month ago as bumblers who are unreliable when it comes to info on the ground in Iraq? To make it look like poor widdle Bush was misled by inept CIA? But yet NOW they can identify a masked man on a poor quality video within minutes with no question of the veracity, though the methods they used for determining this are never spelled out, and never questioned? And Vox points out the old tape of "Osama" that came out during a CYA moment for Bush, and it was OBVIOUS that the man the Bushies said was definitely Osama, was OBVIOUSLY not Osama (yet all the media chimed in it WAS him.) My jaw still drops to the floor on that one. Put a tall arab with a beard and Osama-esque garb in a video, have him say some 9/11 crap, and voila! all will say "Yep, it was Osama" even though the physical resemblances broke down completely on the second viewing of the damn thing!! None of the media has yet gone back to that video and said anything or dared play it again. I think they would be ashamed to run it now with their original BS commentary. It is such a memory hole nightmare that it is fucking out and out scary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. One big flaw in vox's reasoning: Berg was PRO-war. So why would the CIA
whack him? And since he was PRO-war, why did Free Republic finger him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. His dad was anti-war, and it was because of his dad's activities
with A.N.S.W.E.R. the Freepers put the Bergs on the enemies list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Michael Berg's name was on the list, and his company Prometheus
Edited on Sun May-16-04 12:38 AM by Straight Shooter
I've always thought it odd that his father would list his company name, though. I mean he was just the manager of the company, in the background. Michael Berg seems very protective of Nick. Listing the company name would jeapordize his son's employment possibilities.

Michael Berg is the one who listed Prometheus on the ANSWER list, right? Or am I mistaken?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. why does his war stance have anything at all to do with the CIA
killing him?

They needed a dead American civilian. I'd guess that anti-war ones are in short supply in Iraq. Plus, there would be even more attendant suspicion if they killed an anti-war activist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. The freeps fingered his father, not him.
The name on the freep's list was Michael Berg, not Nick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Never thought I'd say this...
...but after the shots out of Iraq, I think my government's capable of doing anything and everything, even setting up and murdering a civilian. Hell, they lied to get us there in the first place, why start being honest now? I could buy this whole thing if Berg had been a random Joe Schmoe contractor pulled out of a car, maybe, but not someone who'd been held by the Iraqi police and US military, long enough to miss a flight home.

It just smells too funny to dismiss.

And I agree, his stance on the war had nothing to do with it. He was in the wrong place at the wrong time, with not enough high-dollar friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. when did they get back online . . .
correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't voxfux offline for a long time? . . . and didn't he consider himself in some kind of danger? . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC