Congressional Accountability for Judicial Activism Act of 2004

H. R. 3920
To allow Congress to reverse the judgments of the United States Supreme Court.

March 9, 2004

The Congress may, if two thirds of each House agree, reverse a judgment of the United States Supreme Court--

(1) if that judgment is handed down after the date of the enactment of this Act; and

(2) to the extent that judgment concerns the constitutionality of an Act of Congress.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:HR03920:@@@L&summ2=m&


--

Alright, why haven't I seen any screams over this one? Look at bullet #2 "to the extent the judgment concerns the constitutionality of an Act of Congress." The whole point of the judiciary is to evaluate the constitutionality (and subsequent lawfulness derived through stare derisis); that was never given to Congress precisely because they're not in a position to understand the subtle details of "constitutionality."

This is an absolutely absurd, and highly dangerous, bill.

I hope this thing never moves forward!

This is a dangerous bill.

...overturned. (12/12/2000) But yes, it would be a dangerous and seriously unconstitutional precedent to pass such legislation.

fucking ass-holes. They are the true terrorist.

At least we now have a partial list of traitors to go on.

Rep. Ron Lewis,Ky. introduced the bill

Sent a letter to Jim Kolbe, he represents my district here in AZ. I told him that anyone who supports this bill, were traitors.



Co-Sponsors

3/9/2004
Jim DeMint, SC Terry Everett, AL
Richard W. Pombo, CA Howard Coble, NC
Mac Collins, GA Virgil H. Good Jr., VA
Joseph Pitts, PA Trent Franks, AZ
Joel Hefley, CO John T. Doolittle, CA
Jack Kingston, GA

3/18/2004
Tom Feeney, FL Sam Johnson, TX
Nick Smith, MI Mike Pence, IN
John J. Duncan Jr., TN Wally Herger, CA
Walter B. Jones Jr., NC Donald A. Manzullo, IL

3/30/2004
Pete Sessions, TX Robert B. Aderholt, AL
Cass Ballenger, NC

4/28/2004
Edward L. Schrock, VA John R. Carter, TX
Mark E. Souder, IN

There it is folks the list of traitors.

:shrug:

Write your congress persons now.

what would happen if they passed it and the supremes ruled it unconstitutional?? lol

Law cannot have paradoxes. This would create a cycle, precisely constructed in the Constitution to avoid this kind of nonsense.