The only legit WMD discovery David Kay could announce...

would be,

1) Proof that Iraq "attempted to buy uranium form Niger", or...

2) Proof that Iraq was "six months away from developing a weapon", or...

3) Proof that Saddam was in any way involved with 9/11, or...

4) Proof that Saddam worked closely with Osama or al Qaeda, or...

5) Proof that Saddam was about to give poisonous gas or deadly germs to terrorists, or...

6) Proof of unmanned aerial drones capable of striking the US, or...

7) Proof that the aluminum tubes were only suitable for centrifuges, or...

8) Proof that the "mobile bio-weapons labs" were not for intended for hydrogen production, or..

9) Proof that Chimpy McWarmonger is not a lying SOB!!!

Not bloody likely!

I mean the man is practically giddy with the thought of releasing such a forged document.

How can one be an impartial investigator and at the same time be dropping hints and lies before such info is ready?

Kay needs to be singled out and labled as the professional baffon he is.

rounds with the filler valves. i saw the pictures of them one night.
i have watched for the debunking ever since. they have dropped totally off the scene. it worries me because no one can come up with an alternate explaination for those valves.

Not sure to which report you refer. Here's Blix's UN reports;

http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/recent%20items.html

45 pages. Some mention of missiles, but I found nothing on filler valves.

LA