A very interesting read on understanding the phenomenon of Dumbya's appeal among his faithful:
Intervention In his only legitimate leadership role, George Bush leads the nation into an era of gpostreality.h
By Gerald S. Rellick
George W. Bushfs dreadful performance at last monthfs press conference should have put to rest any doubts of his lack of fitness to be president. Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen summed it up this way: gBush was so inarticulate in his recent news conference that you could say he violated the standards of his own eNo Child Left Behindf policy.h
William Kristol, editor of the conservative Weekly Standard and a Bush supporter, also voiced dismay. Kristol said he was gdepressedh by Bushfs performance, adding that g
revealed in my mind a failure of presidential leadership."
Nevertheless, in the following week, Bushfs poll numbers hardly moved. So, how then do we understand this strange phenomenon?
The media is the starting point: why is it they give Bush such a free ride? Eric Alterman writes, gWhen reporters attempt to re-ask Bush a question, he merely repeats the same nonsense he spouted in the first place. With few exceptions, reporters tend to let him get away with it.h
But the media doesnft just report events; they merge with them as participants in an entertainment event; they become part of the narrative and take their acting cues unconsciously. When he was president, Bill Clintonfs intelligence and articulateness set up a natural adversarial relationship with the press, much of it unconsciously scripted; reporters felt a natural competitive instinct to challenge Clinton, to match wits with him in a part-playful, part-serious jousting match, in an effort to show off their skills in front of peers and the public. George Bush, in contrast, disarms the press with his witlessness. How do you punch a marshmallow? Or better, why would you punch a marshmallow?
-more-