Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Pres. Kerry expose the Bush Admin and throw them in jail?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 02:59 PM
Original message
Will Pres. Kerry expose the Bush Admin and throw them in jail?
Let's see, this administration:
1. Knowingly used false and fabricated evidence, mostly from a known con-man who turns out to be an Iranian double agent who's wanted for bank fraud in Jordan, has a brother who works for Iranian intelligence in Lebanon, and colleagues who work for Iran, paid him millions of dollars, granted him access to Saddam's secret files, and gave him US intelligence he should not have had. (all despite warnings from the CIA, State dept. and British intelligence)

2. Exposed a CIA agent for political revenge.

3. Deliberately lied, playing on fears of WMD/9-11, to get the American people to support an illegal war.

4. Deliberately violated the Geneva Conventions.

5. Pursued and managed the war so incompetently that they have made the world a more dangerous and unstable place, put our soldiers at risk, and alienated us from the World community, and benefited Iran who is now poised to gain influence and power through the Shia community in Iraq.

Are resignations or a defeat in November good enough? I don't think so. These people are guilty of treason, lies, and incompetence to the highest level. This is totally inexcusable. The only way to set the US on a path to reclaim our reputation is to arrest and jail these dangerous, treasonous, idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. it might depend on makeup of congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Why does he need congress to investigate an ex president?
Just askin. Seems to me all he needs is an agressive attorney general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. politics
he has things he wants congress to pass so he can sign it. if congress remains republican or almost evenly split he will need some republicans to vote for the bills he supports. if he goes after bush it could be hard to get the other side to cooperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nope
But he should
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. What you just said
I have hopes. I will WORK to make it happen (letters, etc.).

But I have little faith it will happen.

Which means that, even if we defeat them, the Imperal Family is oging to come back stronger and MORE BRUTAL and MORE TOTALITARIAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbillhaywood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. That would be really cool, but it will never happen. People
in the government have a common class understanding and rarely throw each other in jail even when there is reason and opportunity to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nope....
and the shit will continue under a different name...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evil_orange_cat Donating Member (910 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. no, I believe there's an executive order covering this...
AFAIK, it protects outgoing presidents from political retribution. Although I think most of the Bush admin needs to be behind bars... maybe a few executed for treason. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOHICA06 Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Except for #2 ...
nothing is criminally prosecutable - well maybe a conspiracy charge.

All that is wrong is not illegal & vice versa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Really?
I would think willfully violating the Geneva Conventions would be criminal, since it's the law in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOHICA06 Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. We'd be tied up in court ....
forever. The Convention only applies to signatories and their Uniformed Armies. The protection for detainees is nebulus.

Again - not right but so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. No he will not
Edited on Thu May-27-04 03:09 PM by Marianne
and that is wrong. There comes a time whenm "respect" for a criminal evil person and letting them get away with crimes against the people of the United States needs to discarded in favor of moral imperatives.

What do we tell the children about being honest, or doing the right thing, not lying, not doing harm to others when their own president is the most egregious liar, a war criminal, and disrespectful of our government process?

This is the man, an ignorant man at that, who is proud of a gentleman's "C" that he received for doing nothing in college, that visits schools, is held up to children as an example, and his wife visits schools also, yet he is probably going to be allowed to get away with murder, literally because NO ONE will call him on it. We do not need to teach our chidlren hypocrisy. We do not need to expect from them, something we do not expect from the president so the logic may go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. No, he'd never expose a fellow "boner".
Seriously, I don't think Kerry would go after the Bush administration. He's too connected in too many ways to do that. Howard Dean, on the other hand, would have done everything possible to nail them. I suspect that his willingness to go after Bush might have been one of the major reasons his campaign fizzled so suddenly.

May I add that the prosecution and punishment of the Bush administration for their crimes would have a monumentally therapeutic effect on the rest of the world. It would be the quickest way to recover our ruined image world-wide. The entire world would breath a collective sigh of relief and America could begin rebuilding itself as the constitutional Democracy that was intended by Jefferson and his colleagues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. It wouldn't help the healing process
Remember, Bush* will get some votes, maybe 35-42%. Somehow or another (and believe me I have no idea how) Kerry has to put a bandage on the wounds of this nation. He has to change the tone and I don't know if a stiff round of judicial proceedings will do anything more than to solidify the opposition against him as well as the best interests of the country.

I'm not suggesting that the Bushistas don't deserve every bit of justice they have coming, but I believe that it's not going to help to keep partisanship on the front burner.

There are some events which could complicate that: One poster already mentioned Congressional makeup which could cut both ways. Another factor/event which could complicate matters would be if Bush or any of his cronies were charged with War Crimes. If that were to happen, Kerry would be presented with some difficult choices in yielding to International Law while facing fierce resistance on the home front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. What if Kerry stopped the Bush admin's stonewalling
And gave all the "bipartisan commissions" everything he has access to? If Bush and cronies were exposed for the treasonous criminals they are, I would think it would be a deathblow to the far right, and help get the country back on track towards the path of sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. yes, Kerry has said and should be much more open
kerry has said and will not be secretive as bush is. he is a big supporter of openness in government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democraticinsurgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. two more big ones
you left out two big ones:

1. shifting of $700 Million from Afghanistan War to Iraq War without Congressional Approval (definitely an impeachable offense and well documented)

2. 9/11 itself. Many of us firmly believe that Bushco were complicit, whether LIHOP or MIHOP, and that makes #1 small potatoes. Proving this will be difficult but IF there is a national will to do so, can likely be done.

Treason, mass murder, conspiracy and racketeering, fraud, what other criminal statutes would be violated by #2?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. "Hahahahahaha-haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-hahahahahahaaa..."
That my friend, is the sound of BushCo. laughing all the way to the bank. The American people are first-class suckers.

"Mission Accomplished." Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcpatriot Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. He should at least try
but it won't work. The masters of the washington puppets didn't have bush go after clinton and all his criminal activity, so why should they care about dumb ole bush. Wherever the money is, that is where the politicians will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Please elaborate
"... clinton and all his criminal activity, ..."

A list with links will do nicely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcpatriot Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Here ya go
Go to infowars.com and do a search on both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Thanks.... Interesting site.
Who is Alex Jones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. At least
you got his name and title correct :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
24. I don't think he would, or really could
That would set a horrible precedent for future presidencies, it should be up to the legislative and judicial branches to check the executive.

What he could, and probably WILL do however, is loosen the reigns on all the information bushco has held in deep dark secret to fuel the fires of the executive and the press.

Actually, now that I think about it, once he goes through all that info, if his admin ran across any clear crime, how could they NOT turn it over to the DoJ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmayer Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-04 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
25. Not after * hands out pardons to everyone.
And then there would be no one to apply leverage to to testify against *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC