Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who's Politicizing 9/11 Now, Mr. Hannity & Co.?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
charlie105 Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 01:16 PM
Original message
Who's Politicizing 9/11 Now, Mr. Hannity & Co.?
Rudy, Mike & George 'trio of stars' at GOP convention

Former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, his successor Mayor Bloomberg and Gov. Pataki will be featured prominently at the Republican National Convention for their actions after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, a convention spokesman said Friday.
“The role they played in New York, the strength, the resilency that they demonstrated to the world is very much a part of what we’re going to show the world at our convention,” said Leonardo Alcivar.


snip...


Democrats have complained that Republicans plan to capitalize on the 9-11 tragedy at their convention. GOP leaders have denied that.

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/breaking_news/story/197856p-170852c.html


Dare not criticize any moves the GOP makes, lest you be accused of treason.
Is this pathetic or what!



:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. They all might just get booed off the stage
A big portion of New York has caught on to their dirty little deed that was 9/11 - and most of the players involved. Guiliani saw it first hand at the hearings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Trademark Rights for The US Flag, "9/11", the word "America" and...
...all references to "patriotism" are now formally vested in the RNC.

All use of these images and terms must be approved by Karl Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie105 Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. If you ever listen to Hannity, the only response he has
against any strong liberal idea is that the liberals are politicizing 9/11 and the 'war on terra'. It's sickening.

KKKarl Rove and co. should have realized by now that their whole '9/11-strong leadership-war president' shtick is sooo over. They have milked all they could out of this. It's repulsing that they continue to ram this down our throats.
But you have to feel sorry for them. Would they be doing this if they had anything else to run on?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Mike bought himself an election after 911 (OBL sure helped the GOP)
Edited on Fri May-28-04 01:37 PM by robbedvoter
Rudy , tried to prolong his term, then penned 2 city contracts mandating the bankrupt city to build 2 stadiums. he broke our budget right before 911. I dunno remember what Pataki is supposed to have done. I know that when it came to struggling with Bushco to cough 20 of the 40 billion promissed for recovery, none of these "stars" lifted a finger - it was exclusively Hillary and Schumer doing the heavy lifting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. why is Bushco so extremely proud of 9/11?
when it was his duty to protect the country and he failed?

I really want someone to ask him that.

Why are you proud of 9/11, Mr. Bush?

People are usually proud of their accomplishments. DOH! Maybe that's why, because 9/11 is Bush's greatest accomplishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie105 Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. There was Hannity again, claiming that we cannot afford
a Bush loss in the face of the recently announced 'terror alert'. What boggles my mind is that if this admin. is so effective in fighting terror, how come it's a good thing for Bush to have more terror alerts? Wasn't he supposed to ensure that we have no more alerts?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah "we'd better keep the guy who failed us!"
doesn't make any sense to me, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC